Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
MYS0DFPTE25MVWR·Mystery · object

3I/ATLAS

3I/ATLAS is the third object known to have come into the Solar System from another star. The ATLAS survey's telescope at Río Hurtado in Chile recorded it on 1 July 2025, and within a day its orbit showed it could not be bound to the Sun: it arrived at 58 km/s on a path with an eccentricity above 6⁠[1]⁠[2]. Unlike 'Oumuamua, it had a coma from the first images. It was a comet.

For the next four months it was followed by most of the world's large telescopes and more than a dozen spacecraft, from Mars orbit to the Jupiter-bound Juice. What they found was a comet unlike ours: a coma made mostly of carbon dioxide, nickel vapour without iron, too little ammonia and carbon chains, dust that polarises light more strongly than any comet's, and water and methane richer in deuterium than any yet measured⁠[3]⁠[4]⁠[5]⁠[6]⁠[7]. The isotopes point to a very cold birthplace around a star poorer in heavy elements than the Sun, perhaps 10 to 12 billion years ago.

It is now on its way out, 12.9 au from the Sun and fainter than magnitude 25⁠[8]. A preprint in July 2025 asking whether it was alien technology drew most of the public attention⁠[9]; the measurements since describe a comet⁠[10]. What is still argued over is how big it is, which ice pushes it, how old it is, and why it changed so much after perihelion. Of the 10 questions on this site, 0 are answered.

What happened

The ATLAS survey's 0.5-m telescope at Río Hurtado took four 30-second images of a faint moving object on 1 July 2025. Within a day the Minor Planet Center had named it 3I/ATLAS, and S. Deen, who measured the early images, reported that it looked fuzzy⁠[1]⁠[11]. Older images turned up quickly: ATLAS's own from Sutherland on 5 June, ZTF's from mid-June, the new Rubin Observatory's from 21 June, and TESS's from as early as 7 May, when it was beyond 6 au⁠[12]⁠[13]. It was already active there, and probably had been since about 9 au⁠[14].

Its path took it close to the plane of the planets and near Mars, Venus and Jupiter, but never closer to Earth than 1.8 au⁠[8]. From August the large telescopes and space observatories took spectra: JWST, SPHEREx, Hubble, Swift, the VLT, Keck, Gemini, ALMA and others⁠[3]⁠[15]⁠[16]. In early October it passed 29 million km from Mars, and the orbiters there imaged it; ESA used their positions to improve its orbit tenfold⁠[17]⁠[18]⁠[19]⁠[20].

Perihelion came on 29 October at 1.36 au, while it was on the far side of the Sun from Earth. Coronagraphs on STEREO-A, SOHO and GOES-19 and the PUNCH mission kept watch, and saw it brighten very steeply⁠[21]⁠[22]. ESA's Juice, the nearest spacecraft, measured its water in November⁠[23]. On 19 November NASA released images from more than a dozen missions and called it a comet⁠[10]. Telescopes followed it out through the winter and spring of 2026; it passed Jupiter on 16 March, and no observation by Juno has been reported⁠[8]⁠[24]. The results kept arriving: the deuterium in its water in Nature in June 2026, the carbon and nitrogen isotopes in July, the methane deuterium at the end of October⁠[6]⁠[25]⁠[7]. JPL's latest orbit, of 21 October 2026, was made to support a new JWST programme⁠[26].

Map of the worldOpen the full map
Mexico CityBuenos AiresParisLimaKinshasaBogotaMadrid12345678910500 kmNParisLimaKinshasaBogota12345678910500 kmN
1
ATLAS Chile, El Sauce Observatory, Río HurtadoTelescope site
Within 1 km
2
ATLAS South Africa, SutherlandTelescope site
Within 1 km
3
Palomar Observatory, CaliforniaObservatory
Within 1 km
4
Vera C. Rubin Observatory, Cerro PachónObservatory
Within 1 km
5
Paranal Observatory (VLT), ChileObservatory
Within 100 m
6
Maunakea Observatories, HawaiiObservatory
Within 1 km
7
ALMA, Chajnantor plateau, ChileRadio observatory
Within 1 km
8
Roque de los Muchachos Observatory, La PalmaObservatory
Within 1 km
9
Teide Observatory, TenerifeObservatory
Within 1 km
10
Hobby-Eberly Telescope, McDonald Observatory, TexasTelescope
Within 100 m
MappedWithin 1 kmNatural Earth

Timeline

Timeline
Squeezed where little happened. Each mark is a published claim, by how it stands:Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedLikely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyStill possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleDisputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedRuled out: The evidence contradicts itRuled out
What happenedPublished claims20252026TESS records the object eight weeks before discovery, 2025TESS images itThe ATLAS telescope in Chile finds it, 2025Found by ATLASThe Minor Planet Center names it the third interstellar object, 2025Named 3I/ATLASA preprint asks whether it is alien technology, 2025Technology preprintJWST finds a coma dominated by carbon dioxide, 2025JWST: CO2 comaThe VLT sees nickel vapour with no iron at 2.85 au, 2025It passes 0.19 au from Mars, watched by the Mars orbiters, 2025Past MarsPerihelion at 1.36 au, behind the Sun as seen from Earth, 2025PerihelionNASA: it looks and behaves like a comet, 2025NASA briefingClosest to Earth, 1.8 au, 2025Nearest EarthClosest to Jupiter, 53.6 million km, 2026Past JupiterJWST isotopes: a cold, ancient birthplace, 2026Isotopes in NatureA new JPL orbit to support a JWST programme, 2026JPL orbit 55Darryl Z. Seligman and colleagues, 2025: 3I/ATLAS is an active comet on a hyperbolic orbit from interstellar space, the third such object found.Seligman et al. 2025Adam Hibberd, Adam Crowl and Abraham Loeb, 2025: 3I/ATLAS might be alien technology, possibly hostile; its path near three planets is improbable by chance.Hibberd et al. 2025Matthew J. Hopkins and colleagues, 2025: 3I's speed places it in an old population, more than 7.6 billion years old, with a high water fraction.Hopkins et al. 2025Aster G. Taylor and Darryl Z. Seligman, 2025: 3I's kinematic age is about 3 to 11 billion years.Taylor & Seligman 2025Martin A. Cordiner and colleagues, 2025: 3I's coma is dominated by carbon dioxide, at 7.6 times water.Damien Hutsemékers and colleagues, 2025: Nickel without iron far from the Sun comes from metal carbonyls.Zuri Gray and colleagues, 2025: 3I's dust has a deeper negative polarisation than any asteroid or comet.Richard Cloete, Abraham Loeb and Peter Vereš, 2025: With no acceleration in the early arc, the nucleus must be more than 5 km across.Yiyang Guo and colleagues, 2025: No nearby star is a plausible home for 3I, and a thin-disc origin is strongly favoured.Romain Maggiolo and colleagues, 2025: Cosmic rays reworked 3I's outer 15 to 20 m, so its CO2-rich, red surface is a crust made in transit.Eric Keto and Abraham Loeb, 2025: The sunward anti-tail is ice grains surviving longer on the sunward side, not something unexplained.Keto & Loeb 2025Michael R. Combi and colleagues, 2025: 3I released 3.2 × 10^29 water molecules a second on 6 November 2025.Combi et al. 2025Man-To Hui and colleagues, 2026: Hubble separates the nucleus from the coma: a radius of 1.3 ± 0.2 km.Hui et al. 2026Martin A. Cordiner and colleagues, 2026: 3I's water and carbon isotopes show it formed below about 30 K around a metal-poor star, 10 to 12 billion years ago.Cordiner et al. 2026Valentin Thoss, Abraham Loeb and Andreas Burkert, 2026: If carbon dioxide drives the push, the nucleus is 0.42 km in radius.Thoss et al. 2026Cristina A. Thomas and colleagues, 2026: 3I's silicates are amorphous and pyroxene-rich, with no measurable crystals.Thomas et al. 2026Małgorzata Królikowska, Federico Spada and Luke Dones, 2026: The non-gravitational acceleration is robust, but the orbit cannot tell which gas drives it.

What was measured

Composition. Inbound at 3.3 au JWST found carbon dioxide at 7.6 ± 0.3 times water, among the highest ratios seen in any comet⁠[3]; SPHEREx traced the CO2 coma out to at least 420,000 km⁠[15]. CN appeared near 3 au with carbon chains strongly depleted⁠[27]; ammonia's products, NH and NH2, were scarce⁠[28]; methanol was among the most abundant relative to HCN of any comet⁠[29]; and the ion tail was rich in nitrogen⁠[30]. Near perihelion the balance shifted: the coma became water-dominated, CO2 fell to about a tenth of water, and by late December CO was the most abundant gas⁠[31]⁠[23]⁠[32]. Methane was first detected in mid-December⁠[33].

Nickel and iron. From 3.1 au the VLT saw nickel atoms in the coma with no iron; iron appeared only inside 2.6 au, and the total metal output was at least ten times other comets'⁠[34]⁠[4].

Isotopes. Water's deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio is 0.95 ± 0.06 per cent by JWST and above 0.66 per cent by ALMA, some 30 times typical comets; carbon-13 is depleted in CO and CO2; methane's D/H is 3.3 per cent, 14 times comet 67P's; and the carbon and nitrogen ratios in CN are high⁠[6]⁠[35]⁠[7]⁠[25].

Dust. Its light shows a negative polarisation of -2.7 to -2.9 per cent at small phase angles, deeper than any asteroid or comet, unchanged across perihelion⁠[5]⁠[36]. Its silicates are amorphous, with no measurable crystals⁠[37]. Whether water ice was seen in the coma is disputed⁠[38]⁠[39]⁠[40].

Size and motion. Hubble first limited the nucleus to a radius below 2.8 km, then separated it from the coma: 1.3 ± 0.2 km for a comet-like albedo⁠[16]⁠[41]. Its orbit needs a small push beyond gravity, about 4.6 × 10^-8 au per day squared at 1 au, peaking a month after perihelion⁠[26]⁠[42]. Its rotation period was measured at about 16 hours before perihelion and about 7 hours after⁠[43]⁠[44]. Four radio searches found no transmitters⁠[45]⁠[46]⁠[47]⁠[48].

The explanations

Most of the oddities have a natural reading. The isotopes, the scarce ammonia and the amorphous silicates fit a body that formed in a very cold disc around a metal-poor star⁠[6]⁠[49]⁠[50]. A second reading holds that cosmic rays reworked its outer 15 to 20 m over billions of years, so the CO2-rich gas seen inbound came from a crust rather than the original ice⁠[51]⁠[52]; the fall in CO2 after perihelion fits that, though it also fits ordinary heating of deeper, water-richer layers⁠[53]. The nickel without iron is best explained by metal carbonyls, which sublimate far colder than metal-bearing dust⁠[4]⁠[54]. The polarisation is fitted by porous aggregates of tiny grains⁠[36]⁠[55].

The size was argued over from September 2025, when an analysis of early positions found no extra acceleration and inferred a nucleus above 5 km⁠[56]. The acceleration was detected once the arc reached perihelion, and the Hubble measurement put the radius near 1.3 km⁠[42]⁠[41]. Balancing the push against the gas lost gives a diameter of about a kilometre⁠[57]; the exact size depends on whether carbon dioxide or water carries the push, which the orbit alone cannot tell⁠[58]⁠[59]. Water rates from the same SOHO/SWAN data differ eightfold between two analyses⁠[60]⁠[61].

The age is in dispute too. Its speed places it among an old population above 7.6 billion years in one model⁠[62] and in the thick disc in another⁠[63]; a traceback through Gaia finds no home star and favours the thin disc⁠[64], and a kinematic age of 3 to 11 billion years leaves room for an object younger than the Sun⁠[65].

The technology reading began with a preprint by Hibberd, Crowl and Loeb, who described it as largely a pedagogical exercise and noted that a path this close to the planets' plane, passing near three of them, was improbable⁠[9]. Loeb placed it at level 4 of a ten-point scale and later listed 22 features he called anomalies⁠[66]⁠[67]. Each has been answered with comet physics: the sunward anti-tail by ice grains surviving longer on the sunward side, in a paper Loeb co-wrote, and the rest point by point by Jason Wright⁠[68]⁠[69]. No radio signal was found, and by December 2025 Loeb said the object was most likely natural⁠[70].

Published claims

Published claims and their status
YearWhoClaimedStatusReason
2025Darryl Z. Seligman and colleagues⁠[2]3I/ATLAS is an active comet on a hyperbolic orbit from interstellar space, the third such object found.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedEvery later observation, from a dozen spacecraft and most large telescopes, shows a comet⁠[10].
2025Adam Hibberd, Adam Crowl and Abraham Loeb⁠[9]3I/ATLAS might be alien technology, possibly hostile; its path near three planets is improbable by chance.Disputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedFour radio searches found nothing⁠[47], the push matches the gas lost⁠[57], and Loeb later called it most likely natural⁠[70].
2025Matthew J. Hopkins and colleagues⁠[62]3I's speed places it in an old population, more than 7.6 billion years old, with a high water fraction.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleA Gaia traceback favours the thin disc⁠[64], while the isotopes point to great age⁠[6].
2025Aster G. Taylor and Darryl Z. Seligman⁠[65]3I's kinematic age is about 3 to 11 billion years.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleConsistent with both the thick- and thin-disc readings⁠[62]⁠[64].
2025Martin A. Cordiner and colleagues⁠[3]3I's coma is dominated by carbon dioxide, at 7.6 times water.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedConfirmed by SPHEREx⁠[15]; the ratio fell sharply after perihelion⁠[53].
2025Damien Hutsemékers and colleagues⁠[4]Nickel without iron far from the Sun comes from metal carbonyls.Likely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyAfter perihelion the metals followed CO, as carbonyls would⁠[54], but an extra early heat source may be needed⁠[76].
2025Zuri Gray and colleagues⁠[5]3I's dust has a deeper negative polarisation than any asteroid or comet.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedConfirmed after perihelion in optical and near-infrared polarimetry⁠[36]⁠[55].
2025Richard Cloete, Abraham Loeb and Peter Vereš⁠[56]With no acceleration in the early arc, the nucleus must be more than 5 km across.Ruled out: The evidence contradicts itRuled outThe acceleration was found in the full arc⁠[42] and Hubble measured a radius of 1.3 km⁠[41].
2025Yiyang Guo and colleagues⁠[64]No nearby star is a plausible home for 3I, and a thin-disc origin is strongly favoured.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleOther kinematic studies place it in the thick disc⁠[63]; Gaia's next release will test it.
2025Romain Maggiolo and colleagues⁠[51]Cosmic rays reworked 3I's outer 15 to 20 m, so its CO2-rich, red surface is a crust made in transit.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleThe composition did change after perihelion⁠[53], but deeper heating explains that too⁠[31].
2025Eric Keto and Abraham Loeb⁠[68]The sunward anti-tail is ice grains surviving longer on the sunward side, not something unexplained.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedAnti-tails from large grains are long known in comets⁠[69].
2025Michael R. Combi and colleagues⁠[60]3I released 3.2 × 10^29 water molecules a second on 6 November 2025.Disputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedA 3D model of the same data and Juice's spectrometer give 4 to 8 × 10^28⁠[61]⁠[23].
2026Man-To Hui and colleagues⁠[41]Hubble separates the nucleus from the coma: a radius of 1.3 ± 0.2 km.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedConsistent with the size the acceleration implies⁠[57]; it scales with the assumed albedo.
2026Martin A. Cordiner and colleagues⁠[6]3I's water and carbon isotopes show it formed below about 30 K around a metal-poor star, 10 to 12 billion years ago.Likely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyBacked by ALMA's water D/H and the methane D/H⁠[35]⁠[7]; a cosmic-ray crust could alter surface ratios⁠[51].
2026Valentin Thoss, Abraham Loeb and Andreas Burkert⁠[58]If carbon dioxide drives the push, the nucleus is 0.42 km in radius.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleThe orbit fits CO2, water and CO activity laws equally well⁠[59].
2026Cristina A. Thomas and colleagues⁠[37]3I's silicates are amorphous and pyroxene-rich, with no measurable crystals.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedMatches an earlier MIRI study⁠[77]; unlike Solar System comets.
2026Małgorzata Królikowska, Federico Spada and Luke Dones⁠[59]The non-gravitational acceleration is robust, but the orbit cannot tell which gas drives it.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedAgrees with the systematics study⁠[42] and JPL's fit⁠[26].

What would settle it

3I is too faint now for most telescopes and cannot be reached by a spacecraft. What is left is the data already taken, and a few more observations by the largest instruments.

The size can be settled from the last Hubble visits of program 18152, beyond 5 au, when the coma was faintest⁠[71]. Which gas pushes it can be settled by refitting the full set of 8,000-odd positions with the acceleration tied to the measured CO2 and water production curves rather than to standard laws⁠[72]⁠[73]. JPL's orbit solution 55 was made to support JWST program 13145; positions far out on the outbound leg will show whether the push has stopped, as outgassing predicts⁠[26]. The eightfold disagreement over water needs both hydrogen-coma models run on the same SOHO/SWAN frames⁠[60]⁠[61]. The age will be tested again when Gaia's next data release allows a better traceback⁠[64].

The larger test is more objects like it. The Rubin Observatory, which found 3I in its own commissioning images, began its ten-year survey in 2026 and is expected to find more interstellar objects⁠[12]⁠[74]. ESA's Comet Interceptor, due to launch in late 2028 or early 2029, could fly past one if it is reachable⁠[75].

Questions

0 of 10 questions are answered.

Key questionsAll 10
0
0 of 0 sub-questions answered·0
Open: 2 answers, none ahead
0
Open: no answer ahead yet
0
Open: no answer ahead yet
0
Open: no answer ahead yet
0
Open: 2 answers, none ahead
0
Open: no answer ahead yet

Evidence 38 findings

See also

References

  1. 1.IAU Minor Planet Center 2025. MPEC 2025-N12: 3I/ATLAS = C/2025 N1 (ATLAS).cited 6 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4ASFC
  2. 2.Seligman, D., Micheli, M., Farnocchia, D. et al. 2025. Discovery and Preliminary Characterization of a Third Interstellar Object: 3I/ATLAS. The Astrophysical Journal Letters.doicited 6 times hereSRC0CSKBD3C762B
  3. 3.Cordiner, M., Roth, N., Kelley, M. et al. 2025. JWST detection of a carbon dioxide dominated gas coma surrounding interstellar object 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.doicited 8 times hereSRC0CSKBDB607EW
  4. 4.Hutsemékers, D., Manfroid, J., Jehin, E. et al. 2025. Pre-perihelion evolution of the NiI/FeI abundance ratio in the coma of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS. From extreme to normal. A&A 706, A43.doicited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFD45Q
  5. 5.Gray, Z., Bagnulo, S., Borisov, G. et al. 2025. Extreme Negative Polarisation of New Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF6D0A
  6. 6.Cordiner, M., Roth, N., Micheli, M. et al. 2026. Isotopic Evidence for a Cold and Distant Origin of the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS. Nature 655, 870-874.doicited 6 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFXVMV
  7. 7.Roth, N., Cordiner, M., Milam, S. et al. 2026. An Enriched Methane D/H Ratio in the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS. Nature Astronomy.doicited 5 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFZ0SM
  8. 8.NASA/JPL Solar System Dynamics 2026. JPL Horizons ephemerides for 3I/ATLAS (solution JPL 55).cited 5 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4PYM8
  9. 9.Hibberd, A., Crowl, A., Loeb, A. 2025. Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?. arXiv.cited 7 times hereSRC0CSKBET26693
  10. 10.Space.com 2025. NASA reveals new images of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS from across the solar system: 'It looks and behaves like a comet'.cited 3 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4QP03
  11. 11.IAU Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams 2025. CBET 5578: Comet C/2025 N1 (ATLAS).cited 3 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4HKRA
  12. 12.Chandler, C., Bernardinelli, P., Jurić, M. et al. 2025. NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1). ApJL.doicited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSEZJ1N
  13. 13.Feinstein, A., Noonan, J., Seligman, D. 2025. Precovery Observations of 3I/ATLAS from TESS Suggests Possible Distant Activity. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF7RZR
  14. 14.Ye, Q., Kelley, M., Hsieh, H. et al. 2025. Prediscovery Activity of New Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: A Dynamically-Old Comet? ApJL 993, L31.doicited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSFC7BZ
  15. 15.Lisse, C., Bach, Y., Crill, B. et al. 2025. SPHEREx Pre-Perihelion Mapping of H2O, CO2, and CO in Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFKWX5
  16. 16.Jewitt, D., Hui, M., Mutchler, M. et al. 2025. Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Interstellar Interloper 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.doicited 5 times hereSRC0CSKBDK04FD6
  17. 17.HiRISE, University of Arizona 2025. HiRISE Image of Exocomet 3I/ATLAS (ESP_089922_9081).cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4MPMQ
  18. 18.ESA 2025. ESA's ExoMars and Mars Express observe comet 3I/ATLAS.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4QTND
  19. 19.ESA 2025. ESA pinpoints 3I/ATLAS's path with data from Mars.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPZ6F4KDEK
  20. 20.Ren, X., Yan, W., Zhao, R. et al. 2026. Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Observed from Mars by China's Tianwen-1 Spacecraft. ApJL.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFZZPS
  21. 21.Zhang, Q., Battams, K. 2025. Rapid Brightening of 3I/ATLAS Ahead of Perihelion. PASP 138, 014403.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFGSCW
  22. 22.Eubanks, T., DeForest, C., Walsh, K. et al. 2025. Tracking the Activity of the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS through its Perihelion. arXiv.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSFNTM5
  23. 23.Bockelée-Morvan, D., Poulet, F., Langevin, Y. et al. 2026. Near-perihelion activity and composition of 3I/ATLAS from JUICE/MAJIS observations. arXiv.cited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFVGKX
  24. 24.Loeb, A., Hibberd, A., Crowl, A. 2025. Intercepting 3I/ATLAS at Closest Approach to Jupiter with the Juno spacecraft. Aerospace 12, 851.doicited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF6YFT
  25. 25.Opitom, C., Manfroid, J., Hutsemékers, D. et al. 2026. High nitrogen and carbon isotopic ratios in the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS. Nature Astronomy 10, 1509-1518.doicited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFTSQF
  26. 26.NASA/JPL Solar System Dynamics 2026. JPL Small-Body Database: C/2025 N1 (ATLAS), orbit solution JPL 55.cited 6 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4PNBQ
  27. 27.Salazar Manzano, L., Lin, H., Taylor, A. et al. 2025. Onset of CN Emission in 3I/ATLAS: Evidence for Strong Carbon-Chain Depletion. arXiv.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSF5TMN
  28. 28.Aravind, K., Jehin, E., Opitom, C. et al. 2026. High-resolution optical spectroscopy reveals the distinctive volatile composition of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSG364A
  29. 29.Roth, N., Cordiner, M., Bockelée-Morvan, D. et al. 2025. CH3OH and HCN in Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Mapped with the ALMA Atacama Compact Array. ApJL 999, L32.doicited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFME6E
  30. 30.Ferellec, L., Opitom, C., Snodgrass, C. 2026. Ion abundances in the plasma tail of 3I/ATLAS show that it is N2-rich. MNRAS.doicited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFSWDJ
  31. 31.Luco, B., Puzia, T., Rahatgaonkar, R. et al. 2026. Very Large Telescope observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS III: High-resolution monitoring of CN and forbidden oxygen emission across the perihelion passage with ESPRESSO. A&A 713, A251.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFX851
  32. 32.Roth, N., Cordiner, M., Milam, S. et al. 2026. Coma Physics of an Interstellar Object: JWST Spatial-Spectral Mapping of 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFY6KD
  33. 33.Belyakov, M., Wong, I., Bolin, B. et al. 2026. The Volatile Inventory of 3I/ATLAS as seen with JWST/MIRI. ApJL 1001, L11.doicited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFWFNM
  34. 34.Rahatgaonkar, R., Carvajal, J., Puzia, T. et al. 2025. Very Large Telescope Observations of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. II. From Quiescence to Glow: Dramatic Rise of Ni I Emission and Incipient CN Outgassing at Large Heliocentric Distances. ApJL 995, L34.doicited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF1VED
  35. 35.Salazar Manzano, L., Paneque-Carreño, T., Cordiner, M. et al. 2026. Water D/H in 3I/ATLAS as a Probe of Formation Conditions in Another Planetary System. Nature Astronomy 10, 988-1000.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFT4QF
  36. 36.Gray, Z., Borisov, G., Kolokolova, L. et al. 2026. Multi-Wavelength Post-Perihelion Polarimetry of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFXBG8
  37. 37.Thomas, C., Kelley, M., Harker, D. et al. 2026. JWST/MIRI Observations of Amorphous Silicates in Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSG7564
  38. 38.Yang, B., Meech, K., Connelley, M. et al. 2025. Spectroscopic Characterization of Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: Water Ice in the Coma. ApJL 992, L9.doicited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSF3D5Q
  39. 39.Protopapa, S., Kelley, M., Cordiner, M. et al. 2026. JWST Reveals Refractory-Rich Water Ice in Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. ApJL.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFRK24
  40. 40.Bolin, B., Cooke, J., Lemaux, B. et al. 2026. Comprehensive Visible and Near-infrared Keck and Gemini Monitoring and Characterization of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS during its Encounter with the Solar System. arXiv.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSG441J
  41. 41.Hui, M., Jewitt, D., Mutchler, M. et al. 2026. Nucleus and Postperihelion Activity of Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Observed by Hubble Space Telescope. arXiv.doicited 7 times hereSRC0CSKBDTT2X79
  42. 42.Spada, F., Królikowska, M., Dones, L. 2026. Systematic and Statistical Uncertainties in the Non-Gravitational Acceleration of 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.doicited 5 times hereSRC0CSKBE2M045R
  43. 43.Santana-Ros, T., Ivanova, O., Mykhailova, S. et al. 2025. Temporal Evolution of the Third Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: Spin, Color, Spectra and Dust Activity. A&A 702, L3.doicited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSF2RC9
  44. 44.Scarmato, T., Loeb, A. 2026. Rotation Period of 3I/ATLAS After Perihelion from Jet Position Angle Wobble and Photometric Variability. arXiv.cited 1 time hereSRC0DFPWGSFPTFT
  45. 45.Sheikh, S., Garcia Lopez, V., Gerrard, I. et al. 2025. A Search for Radio Technosignatures from Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS with the Allen Telescope Array. arXiv.doicited 3 times hereSRC0CSKBG8Y667Z
  46. 46.Jacobson-Bell, B., Croft, S., White, E. et al. 2025. Breakthrough Listen Observations of 3I/ATLAS with the Green Bank Telescope at 1-12 GHz. arXiv.doicited 4 times hereSRC0CSKBG14072Q
  47. 47.Li, J., Tao, Z., Zhang, T. 2026. Narrowband Radio Technosignature Search toward 3I/ATLAS with FAST. ApJ 1006, 163.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFZSGN
  48. 48.Li, J., Tao, Z., Zhang, T. et al. 2026. Periodic Radio Technosignature Search toward 3I/ATLAS with FAST. AJ 172, 172.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFW0KK
  49. 49.Furuya, K., Cordiner, M., Bockelée-Morvan, D. et al. 2026. High water D/H ratio of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is consistent with a low-metallicity origin. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFWBZN
  50. 50.Hopkins, M., Bannister, M., Bitsch, B. et al. 2026. On the Compositions of Interstellar Objects. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSG7STY
  51. 51.Maggiolo, R., Dhooghe, F., Gronoff, G. et al. 2025. Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: Evidence for Galactic Cosmic Ray Processing. ApJL.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFK2GK
  52. 52.Rawat, A., Acharyya, K. 2026. Delayed Methane Detection in 3I/ATLAS: GCR-Driven Subsurface Stratification and Interstellar Exposure Age Constraints. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFWDG1
  53. 53.Shinnaka, Y., Tsujimoto, K., Kawakita, H. et al. 2026. A post-perihelion constraint on the CO2/H2O ratio of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS from [O I] forbidden lines. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFT997
  54. 54.Zhao, R., Zhang, X., Yang, B. et al. 2026. Post-perihelion Coma Composition of the Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS from Optical Spectroscopy. ApJL.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFX1HR
  55. 55.Choi, S., Ishiguro, M., Takahashi, J. et al. 2026. Dust Properties of the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Revealed by Optical and Near-Infrared Polarimetry. ApJL 1000, L29.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFHG4Q
  56. 56.Cloete, R., Loeb, A., Vereš, P. 2025. Upper Limit on the Non-Gravitational Acceleration and Lower Limits on the Nucleus Mass and Diameter of 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 3 times hereSRC0CSKBF1W2CZA
  57. 57.Forbes, J., Butler, H. 2025. The size of 3I/ATLAS from non-gravitational acceleration. arXiv.doicited 4 times hereSRC0CSKBEAE5C2C
  58. 58.Thoss, V., Loeb, A., Burkert, A. 2026. Inferring the mass and size of 3I/ATLAS from its non-gravitational acceleration. arXiv.cited 4 times hereSRC0CSKBEJ85VWQ
  59. 59.Królikowska, M., Spada, F., Dones, L. 2026. Nongravitational Motion of 3I/ATLAS Far from the Sun: Robust Detection, Weak Constraints on the Activity Law. arXiv.cited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSG4XRH
  60. 60.Combi, M. et al. 2025. Water Production of Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS from SOHO/SWAN Observations after Perihelion. ApJL 998, L17.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFGPRG
  61. 61.Tan, H., Yan, X., Li, J. 2026. Perihelion Asymmetry in the Water Production Rate of the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS. ApJL 998, L22.doicited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFJKVY
  62. 62.Hopkins, M., Dorsey, R., Forbes, J. et al. 2025. From a Different Star: 3I/ATLAS in the Context of the Ōtautahi-Oxford Interstellar Object Population Model. The Astrophysical Journal Letters.doicited 4 times hereSRC0CSKBFSA7080
  63. 63.Eubanks, T., Bills, B., Hibberd, A. et al. 2025. 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1): Direct Spacecraft Exploration of a Possible Relic of Planetary Formation at 'Cosmic Noon'. arXiv.cited 3 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF06PW
  64. 64.Guo, Y., Zhang, L., Feng, F. et al. 2025. Search for Past Stellar Encounters and the Origin of 3I/ATLAS. AJ 170, 362.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSF2F8W
  65. 65.Taylor, A., Seligman, D. 2025. The Kinematic Age of 3I/ATLAS and its Implications for Early Planet Formation. ApJL 990, L14.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSEZJCR
  66. 66.Eldadi, O., Tenenbaum, G., Loeb, A. 2025. The Loeb Scale: Astronomical Classification of Interstellar Objects. arXiv.cited 3 times hereSRC0CSKBF9P5MF1
  67. 67.Loeb, A. 2026. 3I/ATLAS is Fading Away, Leaving Us to Ponder Over Its 22 Mysterious Anomalies. Medium.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4HZNF
  68. 68.Keto, E., Loeb, A. 2025. The Physics of Cometary Anti-tails as Observed in 3I/ATLAS. MNRAS.doicited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFE6BM
  69. 69.Wright, J. 2025. AstroWright blog posts on 3I/ATLAS and Avi Loeb's claims (September to December 2025). AstroWright (Pennsylvania State University blog).cited 3 times hereSRC0CSKBFHG41WF
  70. 70.Felton, J. 2025. Avi Loeb says interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is most likely natural as it heads away from Earth. IFLScience.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4JC7M
  71. 71.STScI 2025. HST program 18152: Monitoring Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Departing the Solar System.cited 3 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4M30K
  72. 72.IAU Minor Planet Center 2026. Minor Planet Center observations of 3I/ATLAS.cited 6 times hereSRC0DFPZ6F4K5Q6
  73. 73.Frincke, T., Seligman, D. 2026. Assessment of the Mass Loss and Radius Change of 3I/ATLAS Based on Observed Production Rates. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFXV5P
  74. 74.Rabie, P. 2026. Rubin Observatory begins its 10-year survey of the universe. Gizmodo.cited 3 times hereSRC0CSKBPC83MBM
  75. 75.European Space Agency 2026. Comet Interceptor. ESA Science and Exploration.cited 2 times hereSRC0CSKBC441DM8
  76. 76.Hutsemékers, D., Manfroid, J., Opitom, C. et al. 2026. Origin and evolution of NiI and FeI in the coma of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS throughout its trajectory. arXiv.cited 4 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFSQNQ
  77. 77.Belyakov, M. et al. 2026. JWST/MIRI Finds ISM-like Amorphous Silicates in Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS. arXiv.cited 2 times hereSRC0DFPWGSFX7HD
Last edited 2 Nov 2026
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.