Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What pushed 'Oumuamua away from the Sun?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·8 answers·0·0 following
Eight answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.

Where it stands

Eight answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Eight are still possible.

Why it matters

The non-gravitational acceleration is the measurement every reading has to reproduce, and it was detected at 30 sigma with no visible gas or dust to account for it⁠[1]⁠[2]. The answer fixes the composition, and it is the one property that made an artificial reading arguable at all⁠[3]. An independent re-fit confirms the signal and its radial direction, so the question is the mechanism, not the measurement⁠[4].

Answers 8

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
Evidence: 3 for, 3 against
Still possible
Evidence: 2 for, 1 against
Still possible
Evidence: 2 for, 1 against
Still possible
Solar radiation pressure on an artificial lightsail.
Failed a test; not refuted outright
Evidence: 1 for, 3 against
Disputed
Evidence: 1 for, 2 against
Disputed
Evidence: 2 for, 3 against
Disputed
Evidence: 2 against
Disputed
Show 3 more answers

History

  1. Micheli et al. puts forward: outgassing of water or another undetected ordinary volatile from an icy body, below the limits of every…
  2. Bialy & Loeb puts forward: solar radiation pressure on an artificial lightsail.
  3. Micheli et al. puts forward: the acceleration is an artefact of the astrometry or the orbit fit, not a real force.
  4. Trilling et al.: spitzer limits CO and CO2 to about ten thousand times below what the outgassing model needed; water was not…Against: Outgassing of water or another undetected ordinary volatile from an icy body, below the limits of every…
  5. Micheli et al.: outgassing was the only mechanism the discovery team found physically viable, if the body had comet-like…For: Outgassing of water or another undetected ordinary volatile from an icy body, below the limits of every…
  6. Enriquez et al.: no narrowband radio emission was found from 72 MHz to 11.6 GHz, to 0.08 W at Green Bank.Against: Solar radiation pressure on an artificial lightsail.
  7. Taylor et al.: the light curve shows no secular change in spin, which is in tension with how outgassing comets spin up.Against: Outgassing of water or another undetected ordinary volatile from an icy body, below the limits of every…
  8. Hoang & Loeb: cooling by the escaping hydrogen would cut the volume of warm ice and the gas budget by a factor of five to…Against: Release of molecular hydrogen made by cosmic rays inside an ordinary water-ice body, freed as the ice warmed…
  9. Bergner & Seligman: laboratory work shows hydrogen is produced in irradiated water ice and released over a range of temperatures;…For: Release of molecular hydrogen made by cosmic rays inside an ordinary water-ice body, freed as the ice warmed…
  10. Bergner & Seligman: the model code and data are public, so the cooling objection can be tested directly.For: Release of molecular hydrogen made by cosmic rays inside an ordinary water-ice body, freed as the ice warmed…
  11. Spada: an independent re-fit confirms the acceleration and finds it radial.Against: The acceleration is an artefact of the astrometry or the orbit fit, not a real force.
  12. Seligman et al.: small near-Earth asteroids with no visible activity show non-gravitational accelerations too large for the…For: Outgassing of water or another undetected ordinary volatile from an icy body, below the limits of every…
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion