0
A Decipherment of the Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro (Crete)
Ioannis K. Kenanidis, Evangelos C. Papakitsos, 2017.
What it's used for here
Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences (2017). The authors, who had argued in Anistoriton 14 (2014-2015) that the Psychro stone is genuine, offer a reading of it through a Sumerian-based hypothesis for Aegean scripts. Not accepted by Aegean epigraphers; recorded here as a claimed decipherment that depends on a text most regard as a forgery.
Cited by on this site 4 records
Cite it
Ioannis K. Kenanidis, & Evangelos C. Papakitsos (2017). A Decipherment of the Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro (Crete). https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2017/36988
@article{kenanidis2017psychro,
author = {Ioannis K. Kenanidis} and {Evangelos C. Papakitsos},
title = {A Decipherment of the Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro (Crete)},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.9734/arjass/2017/36988},
url = {https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2017/36988}
}TY - JOUR TI - A Decipherment of the Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro (Crete) AU - Ioannis K. Kenanidis AU - Evangelos C. Papakitsos PY - 2017 DO - 10.9734/arjass/2017/36988 UR - https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2017/36988 ER -
and . “A Decipherment of the Eteocretan Inscription from Psychro (Crete).” 2017. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2017/36988.