Eteocretan and EteocypriotEvidence
Evidence · Eteocretan and Eteocypriot
Brown and Duhoux admitted the stone to the corpus, and Papakitsos and Kenanidis argue it is genuine, though they have…
Brown and Duhoux admitted the stone to the corpus, and Papakitsos and Kenanidis argue it is genuine, though they have not answered Kritzas's specific objections.
What it means
Key questionIs the Psychro inscription a genuine Eteocretan text or a modern forgery?
2 answers, none ahead yet
Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onThe Psychro stone is a genuine Eteocretan inscription of about the 3rd century BC.
Supports1 for, none against
Still possiblewas No evidence yet
Sources 2
SRC
The Eteocretan inscription from Psychro
SRCBrown 1978
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Brown and Duhoux admitted the stone to the corpus, and Papakitsos and Kenanidis argue it is genuine, though they have… [Evidence EVD0DEEDHCQ2ABV]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEEDHCQ2ABV
@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0deedhcq2abv,
title = {Brown and Duhoux admitted the stone to the corpus, and Papakitsos and Kenanidis argue it is genuine, though they have…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DEEDHCQ2ABV},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEEDHCQ2ABV}
}