Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What was 'Oumuamua made of?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·7 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: an ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Seven answers have been proposed. An ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without… leads, with evidence 3 for, 1 against: partly supported by its tests. Six are still possible. Of the two narrower questions under it, none is answered yet.

Why it matters

Its red, featureless surface and the absence of any coma left its bulk composition unknown, and each answer implies a different birth site and a different population of interstellar objects⁠[1]⁠[2]. No composition proposed so far is free of serious difficulty⁠[3].

Answers 7

Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Disputed
An ultra-porous fractal aggregate of icy dust.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Still possible
Manufactured material, a thin artificial sheet.
Failed a test; not refuted outright
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Disputed
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Disputed
Nitrogen ice, a surface fragment of a Pluto-like body.
Tested, but the results don't decide it
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Disputed
None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
Show 2 more answers

History

  1. European Southern Observatory puts forward: a dense, dry rocky or metal-rich body with no significant ice.
  2. European Southern Observatory: the discovery-era interpretation was a dense, possibly rocky or metal-rich body lacking water or ice.For: A dense, dry rocky or metal-rich body with no significant ice.
  3. Fitzsimmons et al. puts forward: an ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…
  4. Bialy & Loeb puts forward: manufactured material, a thin artificial sheet.
  5. Trilling et al.: no water outgassing was ever detected.Against: An ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…
  6. Fitzsimmons et al.: the red featureless spectrum fits an organic-rich mantle half a metre thick that could have kept interior ice…For: An ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…
  7. Hsieh et al.: kinematics suggest an age of about 35 million years and a link to a young moving group.For: Mostly molecular hydrogen ice, formed in a giant molecular cloud core.
  8. Jackson & Desch: satisfies the acceleration, size, albedo and the CO/CO2/dust limits at once.For: Nitrogen ice, a surface fragment of a Pluto-like body.
  9. Levine et al.: formation and survival of an aggregate this size are not demonstrated.Against: An ultra-porous fractal aggregate of icy dust.
  10. Siraj & Loeb: the mass budget and fragment-size arguments weigh against it.Against: Nitrogen ice, a surface fragment of a Pluto-like body.
  11. Bergner & Seligman: the radiolytic-hydrogen model makes an ordinary water-ice body fit the acceleration.For: An ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…
  12. Cordiner et al.: 2I/Borisov and 3I/ATLAS were both ordinary comets in composition, if unusually rich in CO or CO2.For: An ordinary comet-like planetesimal of water ice and dust under an insulating organic crust (with or without…
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion