Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Was the Bloop an icequake, and from which iceberg?

Most likely: the Bloop was one or more icequakes from a large iceberg cracking somewhere between Bransfield Strait and the…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. The Bloop was one or more icequakes from a large iceberg cracking somewhere between Bransfield Strait and the… leads, with evidence 3 for, 1 against: supported by its tests. Three are still possible.

Why it matters

The Bloop carries the case's fame and its attribution is the most cited. NOAA's two pages give different dates for the identification (2005 by the Ocean Service; comparison with 2008 recordings on PMEL's page), and the source iceberg has never been named⁠[1]⁠[2].

Answers 4

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
The Bloop was not made by ice.
Failed a test; not refuted outright
Evidence: 1 for
Disputed

History

  1. CNN: fox suspected ice calving by 2001 because the sound always came from the south.For: The Bloop was one or more icequakes from a large iceberg cracking somewhere between Bransfield Strait and the…
  2. CNN puts forward: the Bloop was not made by ice.
  3. CNN: it was described in 2002 as unidentified and possibly biological.For: The Bloop was not made by ice.
  4. Dziak et al.: icequakes from iceberg breakup are broadband and recorded at long range.For: The Bloop was one or more icequakes from a large iceberg cracking somewhere between Bransfield Strait and the…
  5. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion