Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Incident 88: the Hackensack disc, 3 August 1947

Two witnesses judged it too fast for a balloon and saw no string

Casella said it moved too fast to be an ordinary balloon, and Truex rejected his own balloon idea because he felt no wind and saw no string.

Speculative0

What it means

Answer this evidence bears onAn unidentified flying object that no ordinary cause explains
Supports1 for, 1 against
Still possibleunchanged
What it implies
  1. The witnesses' own judgement favours something other than a balloon, but judgements of speed depend on an unknown distance.For the key question: What did the three witnesses see over Hackensack on the evening of 3 August 1947?

Next steps 2

1
Read The Bergen Evening Record for 4-5 August 1947
Adds evidenceFair odds~2 h
15score
Details

Look for the police report, other callers, or a balloon release that evening (a fair, party or advertising balloons).

2
Bergen Evening Record, 4-5 Aug 1947
Adds evidenceFair odds~2 h
15score
Details

Read the Hackensack paper for the police report, other callers or a balloon release that evening.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

Sources 2

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). Two witnesses judged it too fast for a balloon and saw no string [Evidence EVD0DFY8YXCKFJN]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DFY8YXCKFJN
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.