Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Run · HD 139139, the "Random Transiter"

K2 pixel re-reduction with a per-pixel pointing model and the Kepler PRF (star A vs star B)

The PRF fits the saturated star poorly (wing chi2/pixel ~1,500). Only the bottom bleed-tip pixel is individually significant (4.3σ).

Inconclusive. A vs B and real dimming vs column glitch can't be separated; the apparent exclusion of star B is not robust to B's position or the PSF model.{'col7_ppm': [153, 33], 'wings_ppm': [101, 71], 'baseline_features14': {'A': 11.6, 'B': 89.6, 'dof': 13, 'column_only': 12.9}, 'dchi2_B_minus_A_range_under_robustness': [-52, 84]}0

Result

RunMeasuredResultAgainstDecisionDate
RunChi2 of stacked per-pixel deficits vs PRF patterns for A, B and column-only; robustness of chi2(B) - chi2(A){'col7_ppm': [153, 33], 'wings_ppm': [101, 71], 'baseline_features14': {'A': 11.6, 'B': 89.6, 'dof': 13, 'column_only': 12.9}, 'dchi2_B_minus_A_range_under_robustness': [-52, 84]}1000 random non-dip epochs, 5000 null stacksInconclusive. A vs B and real dimming vs column glitch can't be separated; the apparent exclusion of star B is not robust to B's position or the PSF model.

What it used and found

Parameters

prf = kplr13.2_2011265, inverse-distance blend of 3 nearest, B_offset_px = [-0.36, 0.91], B_shifts_px = [-0.3, 0, 0.3], pointing_model = quadratic in POS_CORR1/2 + linear time, +-2 d, dips masked, gaussian_sigma_px = 0.9

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). K2 pixel re-reduction with a per-pixel pointing model and the Kepler PRF (star A vs star B) [Run RUN0DD2GWQFDB7N]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/RUN0DD2GWQFDB7N
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.