Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · HD 139139, the "Random Transiter"

K2 pixels can't separate real dimming from a glitch in the saturated bleed column

In the K2 pixels the dips lose about 200 ppm per dip, almost all of it in the saturated, bleeding column 7, which is where a real dimming of a saturated star sends the missing charge. A change confined to that column fits the stacked deficit just as well (χ² 0.55 against 1.0 for 2 degrees of freedom), so the pixels cannot distinguish the two.

Supported0

What it bears on 1 answer

Found by 2 runs

RunMeasuredResultAgainstDecisionDate
RunChi2 of stacked 27-dip deficit vs 'real dimming' and 'bleed column only' (null covariance); depth chi2 vs one amplitude; timing KS/permutation p-values{'pointing_p': [0.93, 0.96], 'arclength_p': 0.73, 'column_only': {'dof': 2, 'chi2': 0.55}, 'real_dimming': {'dof': 2, 'chi2': 1.03, 'depth_ppm': 211}, 'spot_level_p': 0.3, 'no_signal_chi2': 324, 'thruster_phase_p': 0.52, 'depth_chi2_rednoise': '124/26', 'depth_chi2_published_errors': '184/26'}600 random non-dip epochs with the same procedureNot a fixed-amplitude telegraph pixel and not tied to spacecraft motion; the pixels can't separate real dimming from a glitch confined to the saturated bleed column.
RunChi2 of stacked per-pixel deficits vs PRF patterns for A, B and column-only; robustness of chi2(B) - chi2(A){'col7_ppm': [153, 33], 'wings_ppm': [101, 71], 'baseline_features14': {'A': 11.6, 'B': 89.6, 'dof': 13, 'column_only': 12.9}, 'dchi2_B_minus_A_range_under_robustness': [-52, 84]}1000 random non-dip epochs, 5000 null stacksInconclusive. A vs B and real dimming vs column glitch can't be separated; the apparent exclusion of star B is not robust to B's position or the PSF model.

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). K2 pixels can't separate real dimming from a glitch in the saturated bleed column [Evidence EVD0DD2G5TEHHJB]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DD2G5TEHHJB
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.