Run · HD 139139, the "Random Transiter"
TESS Sector 91: dip search, injection-recovery and false-alarm tests
The circular-shift null (seed 1, 3,000 realisations, candidate masked) gives a false-alarm probability below 1/3000. It reuses the same noise features and is overconfident; the independent check's 0.5–2 % is the figure to use. The figure's 'TARS (independent)' means an independent pipeline, not independent noise.
Result
| Run | Measured | Result | Against | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | Per-dip completeness and expected detections at the K2 rate (>=4.5 sigma); detections in real data | {'candidate': {'btjd': 3778.5485, 'depth_ppm': 507, 'duration_h': 2.24, 'depth_err_ppm': 105}, 'expected_A': 0.44, 'expected_B': 0.7, 'completeness_A': 0.094, 'completeness_B': 0.149, 'fap_independent': '0.5-2%', 'real_detections': 1} | Noise-only false alarms at >=4.5 sigma: 0.014 per 13.5 d (circular-shift null) · independent check with white and phase-randomised nulls gives FAP 0.6-1.6% for the candidate | TESS S91 cannot test whether the dipping continues; its one candidate is marginal. |
What it used and found
ANS
One marginal dip-like event in TESS Sector 91 at BTJD 3778.55
EVDEvidence it produced
TESS Sector 91 is too insensitive to test whether the K2 dipping continues
EVDEvidence it produced
Parameters
n_trials = 1000, min_coverage = 0.9, rate_per_day = 0.338, depth_scale_B = 1.2, threshold_sigma = 4.5, clean_windows_btjd = [[3775.62, 3780.6], [3789.4, 3798.4]]
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). TESS Sector 91: dip search, injection-recovery and false-alarm tests [Run RUN0DD2GVRRESBS]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/RUN0DD2GVRRESBS
@misc{mysteriesdept_run0dd2gvrresbs,
title = {TESS Sector 91: dip search, injection-recovery and false-alarm tests},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Run, catalog key RUN0DD2GVRRESBS},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/RUN0DD2GVRRESBS}
}