Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · HD 139139, the "Random Transiter"

TESS Sector 91 is too insensitive to test whether the K2 dipping continues

If HD 139139 still dipped as it did in 2017, TESS Sector 91 would have been expected to catch only 0.3–0.7 dips, because its 14 clean days recover just 5–15 % of injected K2-like dips.

Supported0

What it bears on 1 answer

Found by 1 run

RunMeasuredResultAgainstDecisionDate
RunPer-dip completeness and expected detections at the K2 rate (>=4.5 sigma); detections in real data{'candidate': {'btjd': 3778.5485, 'depth_ppm': 507, 'duration_h': 2.24, 'depth_err_ppm': 105}, 'expected_A': 0.44, 'expected_B': 0.7, 'completeness_A': 0.094, 'completeness_B': 0.149, 'fap_independent': '0.5-2%', 'real_detections': 1}Noise-only false alarms at >=4.5 sigma: 0.014 per 13.5 d (circular-shift null) · independent check with white and phase-randomised nulls gives FAP 0.6-1.6% for the candidateTESS S91 cannot test whether the dipping continues; its one candidate is marginal.

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). TESS Sector 91 is too insensitive to test whether the K2 dipping continues [Evidence EVD0DD2FTEBQ37T]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DD2FTEBQ37T
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.