What it's used for here
In R. Gigli (ed.), Megalai Nesoi: Studi dedicati a Giovanni Rizza, vol. 1 (Catania, 2004, published 2006), pp. 255 to 261. Argues on epigraphic and historical grounds that the Psychro stone is a modern forgery. The DOI is the Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum entry (SEG 53, 980) that records the argument, since the chapter has no DOI. Source for the forgery verdict.
Cited by on this site 5 records
Eteocretan and Eteocypriot
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Charalambos B. Kritzas (2006). The "Bilingual" inscription from Psychro (Crete): A coup de grâce. https://doi.org/10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980
@incollection{kritzas2006psychro,
author = {Charalambos B. Kritzas},
title = {The "Bilingual" inscription from Psychro (Crete): A coup de grâce},
year = {2006},
doi = {10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980}
}TY - CHAP TI - The "Bilingual" inscription from Psychro (Crete): A coup de grâce AU - Charalambos B. Kritzas PY - 2006 DO - 10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980 UR - https://doi.org/10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980 ER -
. “The "Bilingual" inscription from Psychro (Crete): A coup de grâce.” 2006. https://doi.org/10.1163/1874-6772_seg_a53_980.