0
A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
Berend C. Stoel, Terry M. Borman, 2008. PLoS ONE 3, e2554.
CT densitometry of five classical Cremonese and eight modern violins. No difference in median density, but the density difference between early and late growth rings is smaller in the Cremonese tops (183 vs 274 g/l) and backs (115 vs 128 g/l).
What it's used for here
The measured physical difference in the wood.
The document 7 pages
Cited by on this site 7 records
The Stradivari "secret"
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Stoel, B. C., & Borman, T. M. (2008). A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins. PLoS ONE 3, e2554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554
@article{stoel2008comparison,
author = {Stoel, Berend C. and Borman, Terry M.},
title = {A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins},
journal = {PLoS ONE 3, e2554},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0002554},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554}
}TY - JOUR TI - A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins AU - Stoel, Berend C. AU - Borman, Terry M. PY - 2008 JO - PLoS ONE 3, e2554 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 ER -
Stoel, Berend C. and Terry M. Borman. “A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins.” PLoS ONE 3, e2554 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554.