Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
MYS0CQPVXHW4RNF·Mystery · sighting

The Phoenix Lights, 13 March 1997

The Phoenix Lights are two events on one evening that have been joined in memory into one. Between about 8:00 and 8:45 pm on Thursday 13 March 1997 a formation of lights, usually described as a V or a boomerang, passed from the Prescott area south over the Phoenix metropolitan area toward Tucson; witnesses along a corridor of roughly 300 miles reported it⁠[1]⁠[2]. At about 10:00 pm a separate row of brilliant lights appeared low in the south-west over the Sierra Estrella mountains, hung for several minutes, and went out one by one; this is what the surviving videos show⁠[3].

The second event has an official explanation. On 25 July 1997 Captain Drew Sullins of the Maryland Air National Guard said that eight of the unit's A-10 ground-attack aircraft, in Arizona for winter training under Operation Snowbird, had dropped high-intensity flares from 15,000 feet over the Barry M. Goldwater range about 60 miles south-west of Phoenix that night, and had jettisoned the rest before returning to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base⁠[4]. Arizona National Guard records placed the drop at 10:00 pm over the North Tac range, and the lights' "disappearance" matches them sinking behind the Estrellas⁠[3]. Video of a later flare drop filmed by a local station looked, in a reporter's words, remarkably like the 10 pm lights⁠[3].

The first event has a probable but unproven explanation. Mitch Stanley, an amateur astronomer in Scottsdale, watched the formation through a Dobsonian telescope and saw each light resolve into pairs of lights on squarish wings, which he took to be aircraft at high altitude⁠[3]. Luke Air Force Base radar operators reported nothing unusual, and FAA radar records were not requested before their routine deletion⁠[3]. Against this, several witnesses, including a retired airline pilot and a psychiatrist, described a single enormous silent object passing low overhead⁠[1], and Governor Fife Symington, who had held a mocking press conference in June 1997, said ten years later that he had seen it too and that it was "enormous" and "otherworldly"⁠[5]. Of the 3 questions on this site, 1 are answered. The most likely answer to “What was the V-shaped formation seen between 8:00 and 8:45 pm?”, not yet confirmed: a formation of five or more conventional aircraft at high altitude, probably military, in a V.

Key questionsset by the editors

Were the 10 pm lights flares?Answered: lUU-2 illumination flares dropped by Maryland ANG A-10s over the North Tac range at 10 pm.
What was the V-shaped formation seen between 8:00 and 8:45 pm?Most likely: a formation of five or more conventional aircraft at high altitude, probably military, in a V
All 3 questions

What happened

The first report came at about 7:55 pm from Henderson, Nevada, of a V-shaped object moving south-east⁠[2]. At about 8:15 pm a former police officer in Paulden, north of Prescott, saw a cluster of reddish-orange lights disappearing over the southern horizon; shortly afterwards the Ley family in Prescott Valley saw five lights in an arc about 65 miles away, which formed an inverted V and then a shape like a carpenter's square as it approached⁠[2]. Between 8:30 and 8:45 pm witnesses in Glendale and across Phoenix saw the formation pass overhead, partly obscured by thin cloud; by about 8:45 pm, according to the sceptic Robert Sheaffer, the A-10 formation had landed at Davis-Monthan⁠[2].

At about 10:00 pm a row of lights appeared over the south-west horizon. Many people filmed it; the best-known video is Mike Krzyston's from his home in the Moon Valley area of north Phoenix⁠[6]. The lights hung, drifted slightly, and winked out from one end. This is the footage shown in nearly every later account of the Phoenix Lights, though it is the second event, not the formation.

The story stayed local until June 1997, when national coverage and a USA Today report brought it to the country's attention, three months after the fact⁠[2]. On 19 June Governor Symington called a press conference, announced that the culprit had been found, and produced his chief of staff Jay Heiler in an alien costume, telling reporters they were "entirely too serious"⁠[5]. City councilwoman Frances Barwood had asked the Air Force to investigate⁠[4]. A month later the Maryland Guard's statement explained the 10 pm lights⁠[4].

Map of the regionOpen the full map
San DiegoSan BernardinoMexicaliOceansidePalm SpringsYumaVictorville12345678200 kmNSan DiegoPalm SpringsEnsenadaYuma12345678200 kmN
1
Phoenix, ArizonaCity
Mapped
2
Moon Valley, north PhoenixNeighbourhood
Within 10 km
3
Luke Air Force Base, Glendale, ArizonaAir base
Within 1 km
4
Barry M. Goldwater Air Force Range (North Tac)Military range
A region
5
Prescott Valley, ArizonaTown
Mapped
6
Paulden, ArizonaTown
Within 1 km
7
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, TucsonAir base
Mapped
8
Henderson, NevadaCity
Mapped
MappedWithin 1 kmA regionNatural Earth

Timeline

Timeline
Squeezed where little happened. Each mark is a published claim, by how it stands:Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedLikely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyStill possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleDisputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedRuled out: The evidence contradicts itRuled out
What happenedPublished claims199719982004200720082014201520162017A V-shaped object is reported over Henderson, Nevada, 1997First report, HendersonThe formation passes over Prescott Valley, Phoenix and on toward Tucson, 1997The formation crosses ArizonaMaryland ANG A-10s drop flares over the Goldwater range, 1997Flares over Goldwater rangeGovernor Symington presents an aide in an alien costume, 1997Symington's alien costumeThe Maryland Air National Guard says its A-10s dropped the flares, 1997Symington says he saw the formation in 1997, 2007Symington's 2007 accountA Phoenix resident admits releasing helium balloons with road flares, 2008Balloon-flare hoaxMaryland Air National Guard (Captain Drew Sullins), 1997: The 10 pm lights were illumination flares dropped by the Guard's A-10s over the Barry M. Goldwater range.Sullins) 1997Frances Barwood, 1997: The flare explanation is too convenient, and the lights need an official investigation and a re-enactment.Frances Barwood 1997Steve Wilson (Arizona Republic), 1998: The witnesses are credible and hard to dismiss, and a military operation is the most likely explanation.Republic) 1998Lynne Kitei, 2004: The lights she filmed in 1995 and 1997 and the mile-long V seen on 13 March 1997 were not conventional aircraft or flares.Lynne Kitei 2004Fife Symington, 2007: As governor he saw the formation himself, and it was something he could not explain.Fife Symington 2007Phoenix New Times, 2014: Both events are explained: the formation was aircraft, seen as such through Mitch Stanley's telescope, and the 10 pm lights were flares.Phoenix New Times 2014James McGaha and Joe Nickell, 2015: The formation was five Maryland Guard A-10s whose separate lights witnesses joined into one object, and the 10 pm lights were their flares.McGaha & Nickell 2015Robert Sheaffer, 2016: The formation and the 10 pm lights were separate events, the first a flight of A-10s returning to Tucson in formation and the second a flare drop.Robert Sheaffer 2016Donald Prothero and Timothy Callahan, 2017: Lights at unknown distance against a dark sky are seen as one object, which explains the single-craft accounts.Prothero & Callahan 2017

The accounts

The accounts divide by event and by date of recording. For the 10 pm lights, the videos are the record; the witnesses' descriptions (lights hovering, then dropping out) match them. For the formation, the earliest accounts were gathered by local reporters in March 1997 and by the National UFO Reporting Center, whose director logged calls that night⁠[7]. Steve Wilson of the Arizona Republic, writing a year later, recorded Dr Bradley Evans of Tucson seeing a diamond-shaped formation pass at an estimated 1,500 feet without sound; Trig Johnston, a retired airline pilot, estimating an object the size of 25 airliners at about 100 knots and 5,000 feet; and Max Saracen describing a huge silent triangle overhead⁠[1]. Tim Ley's account, with his drawing of a carpenter's-square shape with lights along the arms, became the canonical image after it was published nationally in June 1997⁠[2].

Mitch Stanley's telescope observation was made the same night and reported to local journalists within weeks; he said he followed the lights for about a minute and that "they were planes, there's no way I could have mistaken that"⁠[3]. His account is the only one made with magnification.

Symington's account is the one that changed most. In 1997 he staged the alien-costume press conference. In March 2007, to a UFO investigator, to the Arizona Daily Star and to CNN, he said that he had watched the formation himself from near Squaw Peak, that it was "bigger than anything that I've ever seen", and that he had kept quiet to avoid public panic and because of the fraud charges he was then facing⁠[5]. He has repeated the account since. It was first recorded ten years after the event.

A pattern runs through the formation accounts: the earlier the record, the more it reads as lights in formation; the later, the more it reads as a single craft with a dark body between the lights. Timothy Callahan and Donald Prothero argue this is what the psychology of perception and memory predicts for lights against a dark sky⁠[8]; believers argue the lights were on one object from the start.

What was recorded

No radar data survives. Luke Air Force Base reported nothing unusual on its radar, and the FAA's recordings were overwritten on their routine schedule before anyone asked for them⁠[3]. The Black Vault's FOIA requests produced a Luke AFB response that it had no records of the flare drop and a one-page response from Davis-Monthan in 2013 saying any records had been destroyed⁠[9].

First page of Luke Air Force Base reply to a FOIA request about the lights3 pages
Luke Air Force Base reply to a FOIA request about the lightsThe Black Vault (John Greenewald), 1997. Public domainArtifact
First page of Davis-Monthan Air Force Base reply to a FOIA request about the flare drop2 pages
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base reply to a FOIA request about the flare dropU.S. Air Force, 2013. Public domainArtifact

The videos all show the 10 pm event. Tony Ortega's 1998 analysis for the Phoenix New Times, with a comparison to a filmed flare drop and a frame analysis showing the lights moving together but independently, is the fullest published examination⁠[10]. The Maryland Guard's statement is the official account of the flares⁠[4]. For the formation there is no photograph or video that unambiguously shows it; the still images in circulation are of the 10 pm lights.

The National UFO Reporting Center's database holds the civilian reports for that night, filed from the evening of 13 March onward⁠[7].

The explanations

For the 10 pm lights, the flare explanation is accepted by the Air National Guard, the Arizona National Guard, journalists who filmed comparison drops, and sceptical analysts⁠[4]⁠[3]⁠[11]. Its predictions hold: the timing, the azimuth over the Goldwater range, the slow descent, the lights going out in sequence, the parallax across different filming positions. Frances Barwood called it "too convenient" and asked for a re-enactment⁠[4]; no stronger objection has been raised.

For the formation, the aircraft explanation rests on Stanley's observation and on the fit between a V of five aircraft at altitude and the reported track⁠[3]⁠[12]. Its weakness is that no unit has ever said it flew that formation; the Maryland Guard's A-10s are the usual candidate, since they were airborne that evening and landed at Davis-Monthan at about the right time, but their flight that night was for range work, and the Guard has not confirmed a northern transit⁠[2]. The single silent craft explanation rests on the witnesses' estimates of size and altitude, which cannot be checked; lights at unknown distance against a dark sky give no scale⁠[8]. A third possibility, a classified aircraft or a formation from another base, would explain the official silence but has no evidence.

The copycat events show how much the lights depend on their explanation: flares from Luke AFB F-16s in February 2007 and road flares tied to helium balloons in April 2008 both produced reports of hovering lights and both were explained within days⁠[2].

Published claims

Published claims and their status
YearWhoClaimedStatusReason
1997Maryland Air National Guard (Captain Drew Sullins)⁠[4]The 10 pm lights were illumination flares dropped by the Guard's A-10s over the Barry M. Goldwater range.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedThe timing, bearing, slow descent and sequence of the lights match flares, and filmed comparison drops reproduced them⁠[3]⁠[11]
1997Frances Barwood⁠[4]The flare explanation is too convenient, and the lights need an official investigation and a re-enactment.Disputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedNo stronger objection to the flares has been published, and the analyses since all accept them⁠[3]⁠[11]
1998Steve Wilson (Arizona Republic)⁠[1]The witnesses are credible and hard to dismiss, and a military operation is the most likely explanation.Still possible: Not tested enough to call either wayStill possibleNo unit has acknowledged flying the formation, and the base records that might show one were destroyed⁠[13]⁠[14]
2004Lynne Kitei⁠[15]The lights she filmed in 1995 and 1997 and the mile-long V seen on 13 March 1997 were not conventional aircraft or flares.Disputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedSceptical analyses attribute the V to aircraft seen as separate lights through a telescope and the later lights to flares⁠[3]⁠[12]
2007Fife Symington⁠[5]As governor he saw the formation himself, and it was something he could not explain.Disputed: Reviewers disagree about itDisputedHis account came ten years after the event, and the published analyses attribute the formation to aircraft⁠[3]⁠[12]
2014Phoenix New Times⁠[3]Both events are explained: the formation was aircraft, seen as such through Mitch Stanley's telescope, and the 10 pm lights were flares.Accepted: Passed its tests and two independent reviewsAcceptedLater sceptical analyses agree, though no unit has confirmed flying the formation⁠[12]⁠[11]
2015James McGaha and Joe Nickell⁠[11]The formation was five Maryland Guard A-10s whose separate lights witnesses joined into one object, and the 10 pm lights were their flares.Likely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyIt matches Stanley's telescope sighting and the Guard's statement, but the Guard has not confirmed a northern transit by the A-10s⁠[3]⁠[2]
2016Robert Sheaffer⁠[12]The formation and the 10 pm lights were separate events, the first a flight of A-10s returning to Tucson in formation and the second a flare drop.Likely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelySeparate aircraft fit the only known video of the formation, in which the lights move relative to each other, but no unit has confirmed which aircraft flew it⁠[12]⁠[2]
2017Donald Prothero and Timothy Callahan⁠[8]Lights at unknown distance against a dark sky are seen as one object, which explains the single-craft accounts.Likely: Best supported so far, not yet confirmedMost likelyIt fits the telescope sighting of separate aircraft, but the perceptual account has not been tested against the witness reports⁠[3]

What would settle it

A unit record. The Maryland Air National Guard's flight records and the Davis-Monthan tower log for 13 March 1997 would show whether an A-10 formation transited from the north between 8:00 and 8:45 pm; a positive answer settles the formation, and a negative one points to another unit. The FAA data is gone. A photograph of the formation with a known foreground and timestamp would allow a parallax estimate of altitude, which decides between a low silent object and high aircraft. None of the thousands of witnesses has produced one.

Questions

1 of 3 questions are answered.

Key questionsAll 3
0
0 of 0 sub-questions answered·0
Answered: LUU-2 illumination flares dropped by Maryland ANG A-10s over the North Tac range at 10 pm.
0
Most likely: a formation of five or more conventional aircraft at high altitude, probably military, in a V

Evidence 15 findings

Artifacts

The films, photos, papers and objects this mystery rests on, each with its own key and its distance from the original.

See also

References

  1. 1.Wilson, S. 1998. 'Phoenix Lights' witnesses credible, hard to dismiss. The Arizona Republic.cited 7 times hereSRC0CQPVVKC7R3K
  2. 2.Wikipedia contributors 2026. Phoenix Lights. Wikipedia.cited 11 times hereSRC0CQPVVV64VHE
  3. 3.Phoenix New Times (Valley Fever) 2014. The 1997 "Phoenix Lights" Are No Mystery. Phoenix New Times.cited 11 times hereSRC0CQPVV3R3YTK
  4. 4.Associated Press 1997. Flares, not UFOs, caused light show, military says. Deseret News (Associated Press).cited 12 times hereSRC0CQPVTM43EZF
  5. 5.Associated Press 2007. Former governor says he saw UFO. Deseret News (Associated Press).cited 6 times hereSRC0CQPVTVY4XAY
  6. 6.KGUN 9 2022. Man behind famous Phoenix Lights footage still mystified 25 years later. KGUN 9 (Tucson).cited 3 times hereSRC0CQPVWTE5H0W
  7. 7.National UFO Reporting Center n.d.. NUFORC Databank. nuforc.org.doicited 5 times hereSRC0D1SBGVA112T
  8. 8.Prothero, D., Callahan, T. 2017. UFOs, Chemtrails, and Aliens: What Science Says. Indiana University Press.doicited 3 times hereSRC0CQPVW301EKA
  9. 9.Greenewald, J. 2013. The Phoenix Lights Incident, March 13th, 1997. The Black Vault.cited 5 times hereSRC0CQPVX284E68
  10. 10.Ortega, T. 1998. The Hack and the Quack. Phoenix New Times.cited 2 times hereSRC0CQPVVBJ2XJN
  11. 11.McGaha, J., Nickell, J. 2015. Alien Lights? At Phoenix, Stephenville, and Elsewhere: A Postmortem. Skeptical Inquirer.cited 1 time hereSRC0CQPVWJM5N19
  12. 12.Sheaffer, R. 2016. The 'Phoenix Lights' Become an 'Incident'. Skeptical Inquirer.cited 1 time hereSRC0CQPVWAT24B6
  13. 13.U.S. Air Force, 3. 2013. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base reply to FOIA request 2013-05152-F about the 1997 flare drop. Published by The Black Vault.cited 2 times hereSRC0CQPVY9A0EZV
  14. 14.U.S. Air Force, 5. 1997. Luke Air Force Base reply to a Freedom of Information Act request about the lights of 13 March 1997. Published by The Black Vault.cited 2 times hereSRC0CQPVY1G1Z5X
  15. 15.Kitei, L. 2004. The Phoenix Lights: A Skeptic's Discovery That We Are Not Alone. Book, ISBN 978-1-57174-377-0; foreword by Gary Schwartz.cited 1 time hereSRC0CQPVYH44DBT
Last edited 27 Oct 2026
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.