Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What is the Oak Island money pit?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·4 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: the depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. The depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were… leads, with evidence 3 for, 1 against: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible. Of the three narrower questions under it, none is answered yet.

Why it matters

Everything else depends on this. If the original depression was a worked shaft, someone dug it before 1795 and the search has a target; if it was a natural sinkhole, the two centuries of digging have been chasing geology⁠[1]⁠[2].

Answers 4

Evidence: 2 for, 2 against
Disputed
None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible

History

  1. anonymous: the 1861 'Oak Island Folly' says shares sold at an enormous premium; the flood-tunnel claim first appears in…For: The story of a worked pit was invented or inflated in the 1840s to 1860s to sell shares; there may have been…
  2. 'Patrick' (pseudonym): 'Patrick' in 1861 reports digging under the platforms and finding it dry, contradicting the flooded-vault…For: The story of a worked pit was invented or inflated in the 1840s to 1860s to sell shares; there may have been…
  3. McCully puts forward: a shaft at least 90 feet deep was dug and refilled with platforms before 1795 to hide a deposit.
  4. McCully: accounts of 1862 and 1864 describe oak platforms at regular intervals and layers of charcoal, putty and…For: A shaft at least 90 feet deep was dug and refilled with platforms before 1795 to hide a deposit.
  5. Oak Island Treasure Company: the stone's 'translation' first appears in the 1893 company prospectus.For: The story of a worked pit was invented or inflated in the 1840s to 1860s to sell shares; there may have been…
  6. Nickell puts forward: the depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were…
  7. Joltes: no record older than 1857 mentions a pit, a treasure or the three discoverers.Against: A shaft at least 90 feet deep was dug and refilled with platforms before 1795 to hide a deposit.
  8. Joltes: the 1795 story names real settlers of the island, so a core event cannot be ruled out.Against: The story of a worked pit was invented or inflated in the 1840s to 1860s to sell shares; there may have been…
  9. Dunning: coconut fibre, a tropical material, exists from the pit and Smith's Cove; a 1970 analysis identified three of…For: A shaft at least 90 feet deep was dug and refilled with platforms before 1795 to hide a deposit.
  10. Dunning: coconut fibre at depth is not explained by a sinkhole alone.Against: The depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were…
  11. Dunning: a sinkhole opened under oxen on the island in 1878, and a well nearby later showed similar flagstone and log…For: The depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were…
  12. CBC News: a retired geologist who read the Warnock Hersey, Golder and Woods Hole reports concluded the pit is a…For: The depression was a natural sinkhole over a dissolved cavity in Windsor Group gypsum; the platforms were…
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion