Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What do the Lagina-era finds show?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·Part of What is the Oak Island money pit?·3 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: the finds are a mix of ordinary colonial and later debris from farming, logging, military use, shipbuilding…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Three answers have been proposed. The finds are a mix of ordinary colonial and later debris from farming, logging, military use, shipbuilding… leads, with evidence 2 for: partly supported by its tests. Two are still possible.

Why it matters

Since 2014 hundreds of objects have been announced, from a lead cross to bone fragments to coins, and the public impression of the mystery now rests on them. Almost none has been published outside the programme⁠[1]⁠[2].

Answers 3

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Disputed

History

  1. DesBrisay: the island was settled, farmed and logged from the 1760s and has had continuous activity since.For: The finds are a mix of ordinary colonial and later debris from farming, logging, military use, shipbuilding…
  2. Prometheus Entertainment / History (A+E Networks) puts forward: some finds are genuine pre-1795 objects deposited by whoever dug the pit.
  3. University of New Brunswick Newsroom: uNB's laser-ablation lab reported a European lead source for the Smith's Cove cross.For: Some finds are genuine pre-1795 objects deposited by whoever dug the pit.
  4. University of New Brunswick Newsroom: no Lagina-era find has been published in a peer-reviewed or museum report.For: The finds are a mix of ordinary colonial and later debris from farming, logging, military use, shipbuilding…
  5. CBC News puts forward: the finds are a mix of ordinary colonial and later debris from farming, logging, military use, shipbuilding…
  6. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion