Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Marconi scientists' deaths, 1982–1990

The lists hold a quarter of the suicides and open verdicts expected among GEC's UK graduates alone

The lists name 8 GEC employees who died by suicide, open verdict or asphyxia in 1982–1990, against about 32 expected among GEC's 17,500 UK science and engineering graduates at England and Wales rates (ratio 0.25, 95% interval 0.11–0.50; 0.51 at half the rate) and about 161 expected among all 126,600 GEC UK employees (ratio 0.05).

Supported0

What it means

Answer this evidence bears onNo excess: the listed deaths are fewer than ordinary rates predict
Supports1 for, none against
Still possiblewas No evidence yet
What it implies
  1. The deaths on the lists need no cause beyond ordinary suicide and accident rates in a workforce of this size.For the key question: Were there more deaths among British defence scientists and engineers in 1982–1990 than ordinary death rates would produce?
  2. A common cause would have to be shown case by case; the count alone is no evidence of one.For: Did any of the deaths share a common cause, such as killings by an intelligence service?

Next steps 1

1
Check rates for professional men in the 1979–83 OPCS occupational mortality supplement
Adds evidenceGood odds~3 h
22score
Details

Replace the 0.5 multiplier with the published suicide SMR for scientists and engineers (OPCS Decennial Supplement on occupational mortality). Only a multiplier below about 0.25 would bring the graduate ratio up to 1.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

How it was found 1 run

Result. The lists name 8 GEC employees who died by suicide, open verdict or asphyxia in 1982–1990; ordinary rates predict about 32 such deaths among GEC's UK graduates alone and about 161 among all its UK staff. The cluster is a sample of ordinary deaths, not an excess over them.
Test · estimate [95% interval]Against the null and the answersVerdict
Listed GEC suicides and open verdicts / expected among GEC UK science and engineering graduates, 1982–1990ratio · against the two answers
+0.25 [+0.05, +0.45]
NO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25
Excludes “excess”consistent with “no excess”
Same, at half the population rate (allowing for lower suicide rates among professionals)ratio · against the two answers
+0.51 [+0.12, +0.90]
NO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25
Excludes “excess”consistent with “no excess”
Listed GEC suicides and open verdicts / expected among all GEC UK employeesratio · against the two answers
+0.05 [+0.01, +0.09]
NO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25
Excludes “excess”consistent with “no excess”
All listed defence-worker suicides and open verdicts (15) / expected among UK industry directly employed on MoD workratio · against the two answers
+0.04 [+0.01, +0.07]
NO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25
Excludes “excess”but differs from GEC graduates by 2.1σ
Estimate, 68% interval (thick) and 95% (thin). Rule declared with the run: rule out 'excess' if the 95% interval lies below 1; rule out 'no excess' if it lies above 1
Figure 1

Ordinary suicide rates predict far more deaths than the lists contain

Suicides and open verdicts, 1982–1990: expected at England and Wales rates (ages 20–64) for three workforces, against those on the published lists

0100200300400deaths, 1982–1990GEC UK graduates (17,500)All GEC UK staff (126,600)UK defence industry (285,000)ExpectedOn the lists
0100200300400deaths, 1982–1990GEC UK grad…All GEC UK …UK defence …
ExpectedOn the lists
Expected counts use ONS rates including deaths of undetermined intent (most open verdicts). The lists are not complete counts, so the gap shows how many ordinary deaths a list like this leaves out, not a low suicide rate.
Notes from the run

Deterministic; the seed is unused.

Across the evidence every measurement of the same quantity

Listed suicides and open verdicts among GEC's UK staff, 1982–1990, as a ratio to the number expected from England and Wa4 measurements
MEASUREMENTRATIOESTIMATE [95% CI]WEIGHTNO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25This run, GEC graduatesthis department+0.25 [+0.05, +0.45]1%This run, GEC graduates, half this department+0.51 [+0.12, +0.90]0%This run, All GEC UK staffthis department+0.05 [+0.01, +0.09]28%This run, UK defence industrythis department+0.04 [+0.01, +0.07]71%Pooled+0.05 [+0.03, +0.07]100%Pooled by inverse variance. Heterogeneity: I² 70%, Q 10.0 on 3 df.
RATIO · ESTIMATE [95% CI]NO EXCESSEXCESS−0.250+0.25+0.5+0.75+1+1.25This run, GEC graduates+0.25This run, GEC graduates, half +0.51This run, All GEC UK staff+0.05This run, UK defence industry+0.04Pooled+0.05
Pooled+0.0 [+0.0, +0.1]
Disagreement (I²)70%
Against the answers“excess” excluded
Every measurement excludes “excess”, so it is ruled out whichever is right. They disagree with each other.

Sources 3

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). The lists hold a quarter of the suicides and open verdicts expected among GEC's UK graduates alone [Evidence EVD0DGGC25H2Q8T]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DGGC25H2Q8T
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.