Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Were the Hill Antechamber and Dinaledi features bodies placed in dug pits and deliberately covered?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·4 answers·0·0 following
Four answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Four are still possible. Of the two narrower questions under it, none is answered yet.

Why it matters

If they were, these are the oldest known burials by more than 100,000 years and the work of a hominin with a brain a third the size of ours⁠[1]⁠[2]. The final eLife assessment calls that a landmark finding if it holds, and splits on whether it does⁠[3].

Answers 4

Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Still possible
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Still possible
None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible

History

  1. Val puts forward: bodies were placed or left on the floor or in natural hollows and became covered as the sediment moved and…
  2. Wiersma et al.: the fossil-bearing sediment forms by autobrecciation and is reworked in place, so hollows and chemical…Against: H. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  3. eLife reviewers puts forward: bodies were buried by gravity-driven slumping or collapse of sediment within the chamber.
  4. eLife reviewers: reviewers found no demonstrated pit cut, no micromorphology of the disturbed sediment and no full excavation…Against: H. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  5. eLife reviewers: reviewers note articulated elements are commingled with disarticulated ones from the same or different…For: Bodies were placed or left on the floor or in natural hollows and became covered as the sediment moved and…
  6. eLife reviewers: a 2023 reviewer faulted the first version for not weighing erosion and slumping.For: Bodies were buried by gravity-driven slumping or collapse of sediment within the chamber.
  7. Martinón-Torres et al.: published critique finds neither dug pits nor deliberate covering demonstrated.Against: H. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  8. Berger et al. puts forward: h. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  9. Berger et al.: articulated, matrix-supported skeletal regions show bodies were covered before soft tissue decayed.For: H. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  10. eLife editors and reviewers: one of the two final reviewers judged the evidence to convincingly show intentional burial.For: H. naledi dug hollows in the chamber floor, laid bodies in them and covered them with sediment; some features…
  11. Berger et al.: the 2025 paper argues that decomposition on the floor or in a shallow depression is excluded by the spatial…Against: Bodies were placed or left on the floor or in natural hollows and became covered as the sediment moved and…
  12. Berger et al.: the 2025 paper argues the topography and sediment observations exclude slumping as the cause of rapid…Against: Bodies were buried by gravity-driven slumping or collapse of sediment within the chamber.
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion