0
Public reviews of the reviewed preprint (version 1): Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi
eLife reviewers, 2023. eLife.
The four public reviews of the 2023 version. They ask for a demonstrated pit cut, full excavation of the features, micromorphology of the disturbed sediment, PCA scores rather than a lone biplot, sediment samples from inside the Hill Antechamber Feature, and an account of decomposition and joint disarticulation; they argue that skeletal articulation alone does not show burial.
What it's used for here
The specific objections a burial claim at Rising Star has to meet.
Cited by on this site 6 records
Homo naledi and the Rising Star burial claims
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
eLife reviewers (2023). Public reviews of the reviewed preprint (version 1): Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89106.1.sa2
@techreport{elife2023reviews,
author = {eLife reviewers},
title = {Public reviews of the reviewed preprint (version 1): Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi},
howpublished = {eLife},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.7554/eLife.89106.1.sa2},
url = {https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/89106v1/reviews}
}TY - RPRT TI - Public reviews of the reviewed preprint (version 1): Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi AU - eLife reviewers PY - 2023 JO - eLife DO - 10.7554/eLife.89106.1.sa2 UR - https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/89106v1/reviews ER -
. “Public reviews of the reviewed preprint (version 1): Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi.” eLife (2023). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89106.1.sa2.