Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Was the Fajada Butte spiral made and used as a solar calendar?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·Part of Do the buildings and markers at Chaco encode astronomy?·5 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: the site was a sun shrine where the solstices and equinoxes were watched and honoured, not a calendar for…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Five answers have been proposed. The site was a sun shrine where the solstices and equinoxes were watched and honoured, not a calendar for… leads, with evidence 2 for: partly supported by its tests. Four are still possible. Of the one narrower question under it, none is answered yet.

Why it matters

The Sun Dagger is the prototype of the light-marking sites of the Southwest. If people set or shaped the slabs to mark the solstices and equinoxes, it is a precise instrument; if they carved spirals where a natural rockfall already cast light, it is a marker of another kind; if the pattern is chance, it is neither. The site stopped working as recorded in 1989, so the question now rests on the photographs and the model⁠[1]⁠[2]⁠[3].

Answers 5

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
Evidence: 2 for, 1 against
Disputed

History

  1. Sofaer et al. puts forward: the slabs were set or shaped so that midday light marks the solstices and equinoxes on the spirals, and the…
  2. Sofaer et al.: at summer solstice a single dagger of light crosses the centre of the large spiral; at the winter solstice…For: The slabs were set or shaped so that midday light marks the solstices and equinoxes on the spirals, and the…
  3. Newman et al. puts forward: the slabs are a natural rockfall and the spirals were carved where its light fell, so the marking is…
  4. Newman et al.: the slabs could have fallen into their positions naturally.Against: The slabs were set or shaped so that midday light marks the solstices and equinoxes on the spirals, and the…
  5. Newman et al.: a geological assessment found that the slabs could have reached their positions by rockfall.For: The slabs are a natural rockfall and the spirals were carved where its light fell, so the marking is…
  6. Zeilik puts forward: the site was a sun shrine where the solstices and equinoxes were watched and honoured, not a calendar for…
  7. Schaefer & Stamm puts forward: the light play on the spirals is coincidence; the spirals were not placed to mark the sun.
  8. Schaefer & Stamm: across the Southwest, light-marking sites cluster at the solstices and equinoxes far above the chance…For: The slabs were set or shaped so that midday light marks the solstices and equinoxes on the spirals, and the…
  9. Schaefer & Stamm: a 2020 review treats the slabs and their edges as natural.For: The slabs are a natural rockfall and the spirals were carved where its light fell, so the marking is…
  10. Schaefer & Stamm: ethnography of the descendant peoples links sun daggers with sun shrines, where a sun-watcher kept vigil with…For: The site was a sun shrine where the solstices and equinoxes were watched and honoured, not a calendar for…
  11. Schaefer & Stamm: two regional surveys find the declinations of light-marking sites clustered at the solstices and equinoxes,…Against: The light play on the spirals is coincidence; the spirals were not placed to mark the sun.
  12. Schaefer & Stamm: chance coincidences of light and spiral are common, 20 to 33 per cent of candidate sites in one field test.For: The light play on the spirals is coincidence; the spirals were not placed to mark the sun.
  13. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion