Why was Hattusa abandoned?
Most likely: the court moved away for political reasons, leaving the capital to declineAhead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
Where it stands
Four answers have been proposed. Consecutive harvest failures in central Anatolia made the capital and its grain system unsustainable. leads, with evidence 2 for, 1 against: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible.
Why it matters
The Hittite capital is the case where climate evidence is nearest in space and time, and where archaeology now shows abandonment rather than conquest[1].
Answers 4
History
- Edgerton & Wilson puts forward: hattusa was sacked by enemies, local (the Kaska) or the Sea Peoples.
- Edgerton & Wilson: ramesses III lists Hatti among the lands that could not stand before the invaders.For: Hattusa was sacked by enemies, local (the Kaska) or the Sea Peoples.
- Manning et al. puts forward: consecutive harvest failures in central Anatolia made the capital and its grain system unsustainable.
- Manning et al. puts forward: the court moved away for political reasons, leaving the capital to decline.
- Manning et al.: thirteenth-century texts on grain shortages lack detail and are read differently by different scholars.Against: Consecutive harvest failures in central Anatolia made the capital and its grain system unsustainable.
- Manning et al.: three consecutive severe dry years about 1198–1196 BC in the Gordion record, 230 km from Hattusa.For: Consecutive harvest failures in central Anatolia made the capital and its grain system unsustainable.
- Manning et al.: investigations indicate the city was emptied by its administration and burned later.Against: Hattusa was sacked by enemies, local (the Kaska) or the Sea Peoples.
- Manning et al.: elements of the Hittite political system continued in the south-east and northern Syria, on a smaller scale.For: The court moved away for political reasons, leaving the capital to decline.
- Hagens: fifteen significant droughts across the kingdom's last century suggest a cumulative decline.For: Consecutive harvest failures in central Anatolia made the capital and its grain system unsustainable.
- Asked on this site