Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
MethodsEpigraphy; statisticsWithin-name position test against a shuffle
Method · epigraphy; statistics

Within-name position test against a shuffle

Look for name templates, such as the Sumerian en-X and lugal-X types, without reading the signs.

Epigraphy; statisticsVersion 1.0Licence MIT8 runsUsed on 1 mystery

Questions it answers

Code Python

Runs and results 8 runs · 6 shown

RunMysteryMeasuredResultAgainstDate
RUN0DFQT8EXEJAZProto-cuneiform:Element share by archive group against a resampling null; count of names with EN first against a within-name shuffle{'EN_first': {'p': '<0.0002', 'first': 54, 'names': 80, 'expected': 33.2, 'shuffle_95': [25, 42]}, 'PAP_first': {'first': 6, 'names': 27, 'shuffle_95': [7, 17]}, 'S_excavated': {'null_95': [0.056, 0.169], 'observed': 0.105}, 'S+EN_excavated': {'n': 124, 'null_95': [0.121, 0.25], 'observed': 0.161}, 'S_unprovenanced': {'null_95': [0.067, 0.123], 'observed': 0.13}, 'S+EN_unprovenanced': {'n': 416, 'null_95': [0.127, 0.2], 'observed': 0.296}}Resampled Uruk III administrative signs (archive split) · 5,000 within-name shuffles (position)
RUN0DFVQRTQ3FBFProto-cuneiform:Share of recurring multi-sign names (same sign set, two or more attestations) transliterated in more than one order{'share': 0.379, 'EN_recurring': 10, 'recurring_names': 58, 'EN_recurring_mixed': 5, 'written_in_2plus_orders': 22, 'EN_first_in_recurring_attestations': '18 of 27'}
RUN0DG2ZTHGRFCVProto-cuneiform:Share of multi-sign NI names containing a body-part sign vs resampled base rate0.417Null median 0.083 (95%: 0–0.333)
RUN0DG377KDWWGKProto-cuneiform:Share of Uruk multi-sign name types whose sign multiset equals an ED/OAkk PN, vs names rebuilt by shuffling name signs0.109Shuffle null median 0.113 (95% 0.089–0.137)
RUN0DG377Z658N0Proto-cuneiform:Share of NI-containing PN types that contain a body-part sign, vs all PN types; NI rate after body-part signs vs after other signsED IIIb 0.176 vs 0.175All PN types with a body-part sign
RUN0DG378H71FBRProto-cuneiform:Spearman correlation of per-sign final-position share, Uruk III names vs Archaic Ur read names0.011Permutation null 95% −0.46 to 0.45

Applied to

2 datasetsArchaic personal names in proto-cuneiform (editor-marked, CDLI), Early Dynastic Sumerian personal names, lemmatized (Oracc ePSD2 admin corpora ED I–II, IIIa, IIIb)

References

  1. Updated sign-frequency list for the whole CDLI proto-cuneiform corpus (6,726 artifacts, 5,274 with readable signs, about 53,000 non-numerical tokens as of May 2020), an open counting tool, and a test showing the Tribute list's first section uses sign pairs rare in administrative texts. Cuneiform Digital Library Bulletin 2021:6.
  2. Recent survey of proto-cuneiform and its adaptation (proto-Elamite), restating Englund's case against Sumerian (no Sumerian-pattern names; numeral-before-noun syntax), dating the first secure syllabic signs to the Archaic Ur texts (c. 2900-2700 BC), and discussing Sproat's simulation and Glassner's divination theory. Oxford Research Archive preprint; year inferred from its latest references.
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.