0
Statistical analysis of Curiosity data shows no evidence for a strong seasonal cycle of martian methane
Edward Gillen, Paul B. Rimmer, David C. Catling, 2020. Icarus 336, 113407.
Gaussian-process regression of the TLS data reported in 2018 finds the data as a whole not statistically consistent with seasonal variability; the enriched subset alone is equally consistent with stochastic or periodic behaviour.
What it's used for here
The statistical challenge to the seasonal cycle.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is the publisher's, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
doi.org · fetched 27 Oct 2026Open the file
Loading…
Cited by on this site 5 records
Cite it
Gillen, E., Rimmer, P. B., & Catling, D. C. (2020). Statistical analysis of Curiosity data shows no evidence for a strong seasonal cycle of martian methane. Icarus 336, 113407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407
@article{gillen2020statistical,
author = {Gillen, Edward and Rimmer, Paul B. and Catling, David C.},
title = {Statistical analysis of Curiosity data shows no evidence for a strong seasonal cycle of martian methane},
journal = {Icarus 336, 113407},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407}
}TY - JOUR TI - Statistical analysis of Curiosity data shows no evidence for a strong seasonal cycle of martian methane AU - Gillen, Edward AU - Rimmer, Paul B. AU - Catling, David C. PY - 2020 JO - Icarus 336, 113407 DO - 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407 ER -
Gillen, Edward et al.. “Statistical analysis of Curiosity data shows no evidence for a strong seasonal cycle of martian methane.” Icarus 336, 113407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113407.