0
Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater
G. S. Collins, N. Artemieva, K. Wünnemann et al., 2008. Terra Nova 20(2), 165–168.
Argues the lake is not crater-like, has no impactor material, and has mature trees close by apparently unaffected, and that a fragment would need 10–40 MPa tensile strength to reach the ground intact, 10–100 times more than large stony meteorites show.
What it's used for here
The case against the crater reading.
Cited by on this site 6 records
The 1908 Tunguska event
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Collins, G. S., Artemieva, N., Wünnemann, K., Bland, P. A., Reimold, W. U., & Koeberl, C. (2008). Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater. Terra Nova 20(2), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x
@article{collins2008cheko,
author = {Collins, G. S. and Artemieva, N. and Wünnemann, K. and Bland, P. A. and Reimold, W. U. and Koeberl, C.},
title = {Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater},
journal = {Terra Nova 20(2), 165–168},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x}
}TY - JOUR TI - Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater AU - Collins, G. S. AU - Artemieva, N. AU - Wünnemann, K. AU - Bland, P. A. AU - Reimold, W. U. AU - Koeberl, C. PY - 2008 JO - Terra Nova 20(2), 165–168 DO - 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x ER -
Collins, G. S. et al.. “Evidence that Lake Cheko is not an impact crater.” Terra Nova 20(2), 165–168 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00791.x.