0
Commentary on the Article "Image Formation on the Holy Shroud—A Digital 3D Approach" by Cicero Moraes
Tristan Casabianca, Emanuela Marinelli, Alessandro Piana, 2026. Archaeometry 68(4): 861-863.
Argues that the reconstruction does not support the low-relief hypothesis because of ambiguous aims, methodological flaws and omitted features of the cloth.
What it's used for here
The published rebuttal to Moraes.
Cited by on this site 2 records
The Shroud of Turin
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Casabianca, T., Marinelli, E., & Piana, A. (2026). Commentary on the Article "Image Formation on the Holy Shroud—A Digital 3D Approach" by Cicero Moraes. Archaeometry 68(4): 861-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70109
@article{casabianca2026commentary,
author = {Casabianca, Tristan and Marinelli, Emanuela and Piana, Alessandro},
title = {Commentary on the Article "Image Formation on the Holy Shroud—A Digital 3D Approach" by Cicero Moraes},
journal = {Archaeometry 68(4): 861-863},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1111/arcm.70109},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70109}
}TY - JOUR TI - Commentary on the Article "Image Formation on the Holy Shroud—A Digital 3D Approach" by Cicero Moraes AU - Casabianca, Tristan AU - Marinelli, Emanuela AU - Piana, Alessandro PY - 2026 JO - Archaeometry 68(4): 861-863 DO - 10.1111/arcm.70109 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70109 ER -
Casabianca, Tristan et al.. “Commentary on the Article "Image Formation on the Holy Shroud—A Digital 3D Approach" by Cicero Moraes.” Archaeometry 68(4): 861-863 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70109.