0
A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Part 1)
Reviel Netz, Ken Saito, Natalie Tchernetska, 2001. SCIAMVS 2, 9-29.
The first study of The Method from the new images, arguing that proposition 14 compares two infinite collections of slices as wholes. Part 2 followed in SCIAMVS 3 (2002), 109-125.
What it's used for here
The published origin of the actual-infinity reading.
Cited by on this site 1 record
The Archimedes Palimpsest
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Netz, R., Saito, K., & Tchernetska, N. (2001). A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Part 1). SCIAMVS 2, 9-29. https://sciamvs.org/files/SCIAMVS_02_000-000_contents.pdf
@article{netz2001method,
author = {Netz, Reviel and Saito, Ken and Tchernetska, Natalie},
title = {A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Part 1)},
journal = {SCIAMVS 2, 9-29},
year = {2001},
url = {https://sciamvs.org/files/SCIAMVS_02_000-000_contents.pdf}
}TY - JOUR TI - A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Part 1) AU - Netz, Reviel AU - Saito, Ken AU - Tchernetska, Natalie PY - 2001 JO - SCIAMVS 2, 9-29 UR - https://sciamvs.org/files/SCIAMVS_02_000-000_contents.pdf ER -
Netz, Reviel et al.. “A New Reading of Method Proposition 14: Preliminary Evidence from the Archimedes Palimpsest (Part 1).” SCIAMVS 2, 9-29 (2001).