0
Review of The Archimedes Palimpsest, ed. Netz, Noel, Tchernetska and Wilson
Fabio Acerbi, 2013. Aestimatio 10, 34-46.
A specialist review of the 2011 edition that sets out the Archimedean manuscript tradition (Codices A, B and C), praises the images and conservation, and criticises the edition's treatment of abbreviations, diagrams and tradition as unreliable in places.
What it's used for here
Source for the manuscript tradition and for the published doubts about the edition.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is © Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science, all rights reserved, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
doi.org · fetched 27 Oct 2026
Loading…
Cited by on this site 9 records
FIG
The Archimedes Palimpsest
MYSThe mystery article
Cite it
Acerbi, F. (2013). Review of The Archimedes Palimpsest, ed. Netz, Noel, Tchernetska and Wilson. Aestimatio 10, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017
@article{acerbi2013review,
author = {Acerbi, Fabio},
title = {Review of The Archimedes Palimpsest, ed. Netz, Noel, Tchernetska and Wilson},
journal = {Aestimatio 10, 34-46},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017},
url = {https://doi.org/10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017}
}TY - JOUR TI - Review of The Archimedes Palimpsest, ed. Netz, Noel, Tchernetska and Wilson AU - Acerbi, Fabio PY - 2013 JO - Aestimatio 10, 34-46 DO - 10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017 UR - https://doi.org/10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017 ER -
Acerbi, Fabio. “Review of The Archimedes Palimpsest, ed. Netz, Noel, Tchernetska and Wilson.” Aestimatio 10, 34-46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.33137/aestimatio.v10i0.26017.