0
Dorabella unMASCed - the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher
Viktor Wase, 2023. Cryptologia (online 20 November 2023; 49: 15-24).
Shows that solvers break English and Latin monoalphabetic ciphers as short as Dorabella, and fail on Dorabella.
What it's used for here
Strongest published argument against a plain substitution.
Cited by on this site 4 records
Cite it
Wase, V. (2023). Dorabella unMASCed - the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher. Cryptologia (online 20 November 2023; 49: 15-24). https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466
@article{wase2023unmasced,
author = {Wase, Viktor},
title = {Dorabella unMASCed - the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher},
journal = {Cryptologia (online 20 November 2023; 49: 15-24)},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466}
}TY - JOUR TI - Dorabella unMASCed - the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher AU - Wase, Viktor PY - 2023 JO - Cryptologia (online 20 November 2023; 49: 15-24) DO - 10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466 ER -
Wase, Viktor. “Dorabella unMASCed - the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher.” Cryptologia (online 20 November 2023; 49: 15-24) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466.