Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Does the government hold field data from AAWSAP's ranch work, and has any been released?

Three answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.

Where it stands

Three answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Three are still possible.

Why it matters

The program manager and his co-authors say the ranch work produced data and reports⁠[1]. AARO cites a 2009 contractor report as its source on that work⁠[2]. None has been released.

Answers 3

Evidence: 2 for
Still possible
None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible

History

  1. Lacatski et al. puts forward: yes; DIA or another agency holds contractor field reports or sensor data from the ranch that have not been…
  2. Lacatski et al.: the program manager and co-authors say field reports exist.For: Yes; DIA or another agency holds contractor field reports or sensor data from the ranch that have not been…
  3. Greenewald: dIA found no record of Lacatski's 2007 letter to Bigelow.For: No; any field data stayed with Bigelow's company, and the government holds at most summaries.
  4. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office puts forward: no; any field data stayed with Bigelow's company, and the government holds at most summaries.
  5. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office: aARO's account of the Utah work cites a review, dated 30 July 2009, of a report from the contractor.For: Yes; DIA or another agency holds contractor field reports or sensor data from the ranch that have not been…
  6. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office: aARO found no substantive case work beyond reviews of old cases and interviews.For: No; any field data stayed with Bigelow's company, and the government holds at most summaries.
  7. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion