Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What did the DIA's AAWSAP program actually do at the ranch, and what does it hold?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·3 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: aAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor…Ahead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Three answers have been proposed. AAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor… leads, with evidence 3 for: partly supported by its tests. Two are still possible. Of the two narrower questions under it, one is answered.

Why it matters

The program is the ranch's claim to seriousness. The released documents show a $22 million contract for "advanced aerospace weapon system" studies and 38 reference papers; the ranch work was known only from a self-published book by the program manager until 2024, when the Pentagon's own review described it⁠[1]⁠[2]⁠[3]. What it did there is now partly on the record; what it holds is not.

Answers 3

Evidence: 3 for, 1 against
Most likely
None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible

History

  1. Benson: senator Reid confirmed the program and Bigelow's role.For: The ranch was AAWSAP's principal field site and the government holds field data and reports on it.
  2. Lacatski et al. puts forward: the ranch was AAWSAP's principal field site and the government holds field data and reports on it.
  3. Lacatski et al.: three participants, including the program manager, say so in print after prepublication review.For: The ranch was AAWSAP's principal field site and the government holds field data and reports on it.
  4. Greenewald puts forward: aAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor…
  5. Greenewald: the released contract documents, briefings and all 37 released reports concern aerospace and physics topics,…For: AAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor…
  6. Specktor: the 2022 release of 1,574 pages likewise does not mention the ranch.For: AAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor…
  7. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office: aARO found no substantive case work beyond reviews and interviews, and calls the Utah work unrelated to the…Against: The ranch was AAWSAP's principal field site and the government holds field data and reports on it.
  8. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office: aARO reports that AAWSAP investigated an alleged hotspot of paranormal activity at a Utah property owned by…For: The ranch was AAWSAP's principal field site and the government holds field data and reports on it.
  9. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office: aARO says DIA did not seek or authorise the Utah work, which the contractor did with the support of the DIA…For: AAWSAP was mainly a paper study whose ranch component was small, informal or carried by the contractor…
  10. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion