Does the name entry EN AN E2 on MS 3035 (P006268, obv. i 1.b09) contain the divine name Enlil, written as in Early Dynastic {d}en-lil2?
Two answers, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.
Where it stands
Two answers have been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. Two are still possible.
Why it matters
Englund held that no archaic name contains a plausible Sumerian divine element. This entry has exactly the sign make-up of {d}en-lil2 (LIL2 is the E2 sign), which occurs 17 times in Early Dynastic administrative names. If the reading holds, the archaic names include at least one theophoric element, and the god Enlil appears in the Uruk III record. The alternative is a chance combination of EN 'lord', AN and E2 'house'.
Answers 2
Next steps 1
1
Check EN AN E2 = Enlil
Could decideFair odds~4 h
23score
Details
Compare EN AN E2 on MS 3035 with archaic EN.E2 attestations (lexical lists, Cities list) and Early Dynastic {d}en-lil2 spellings to judge whether it writes Enlil.
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes