Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Proto-cuneiform: the archaic texts of Uruk

No 'oil for the feet/hands' names or terms in later Sumerian

No Early Dynastic or Old Akkadian personal name or lemma combines ì (oil) directly with a body part in the sense 'oil for the feet/hands/head'. The i3 + body-part hits are verbal forms (i3-kuš2, i3-ši-…) or Akkadian syllables. So the commodity reading of NI does not explain the archaic body-part pairing either, although NI as a logogram or designation remains open.

Suggestive0

What it means

Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onNI is a logogram; GIR3 NI is a designation
Bears on1 for, 1 against
Still possibleunchanged
What it implies
  1. Neither a later Sumerian possessive nor an oil compound accounts for NI with body parts; the archaic pattern (5 name types, partly repeats of one name) is best left as an archaic designation of unknown reading.For: Is the archaic designation GIR3 NI the Sumerian name giri3-ni, with NI writing the possessive -ni ('his')?

Next steps 8

1
49score
Details

Read the five non-name GIR3 NI entries (W 22135,0; IM 074298; MS 2427; MS 2443; MSVO 1, 217) in full context and classify each as person, office or commodity.

2
39score
Details

Collate on photographs the NI names (P006268, P005573, P006053, P006118, P006182 and the SAG/SZU NI names) and the five counted GIR3 NI entries (W 22135,0; IM 074298; MS 2427; MS 2443; MSVO 1, 217): is the sign NI, does it stand inside the name, and are the counted entries persons?

3
39score
Details

Have a specialist check on photographs that NI in P006268, P005573, P006053, P006118, P006182 and the SAG/SZU NI names is the NI sign (not a variant of a similar sign) and stands within the name, and whether the counted GIR3 NI entries at Uruk and Jemdet Nasr are persons.

4
39score
Details

Collate the NI names on photographs with a specialist.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takesAll 8 on the question

How it was found 1 run

Result. In ED IIIa, IIIb and OAkk names, NI goes with body parts at the background rate (13/14%, 18/18%, 13/14%), and -ni after body parts is barely above -ni after other signs (5.0% vs 4.3–4.7%). No ì + body-part ('oil for the feet') names or lemmas exist. In Archaic Ur names NI is already the verbal prefix i3- and final -ni.
Share of NI-containing PN types that contain a body-part sign, vs all PN types; NI rate after body-part signs vs after other signsED IIIb 0.176 vs 0.175The archaic NI–body-part pairing has no Sumerian counterpart; it counts against the possessive reading and does not support the oil reading.

Sources 1

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). No 'oil for the feet/hands' names or terms in later Sumerian [Evidence EVD0DG361CPFAQP]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DG361CPFAQP
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.