Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Proto-cuneiform: the archaic texts of Uruk

Later Sumerian names do not pair -ni with body parts, and grammar is not written before Archaic Ur

In every Early Dynastic and Old Akkadian name corpus, names containing the NI sign have a body-part sign no more often than names in general (ED IIIa 13% vs 14%, ED IIIb 18% vs 18%, OAkk 13% vs 14%). Body-part signs are followed by NI only slightly more than other signs (5.0% vs 4.3–4.7%). The archaic concentration (5 of 7 NI name types) therefore has no counterpart in Sumerian naming. Grammatical morphemes are also first spelled in the Archaic Ur texts and stay optional until about 2470 BC.

Supported0

What it means

Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onNI writes the possessive -ni in body-part names
Counts against1 for, 1 against
Still possibleunchanged
What it implies
  1. The possessive reading of NI loses both supports: later Sumerian names do not show the pattern, and Uruk III is too early for a written suffix.For: Is the archaic designation GIR3 NI the Sumerian name giri3-ni, with NI writing the possessive -ni ('his')?
  2. The best candidate for a phonetic Sumerian element in Uruk III is withdrawn; the archaic names still give no secure phonetic spelling.For the key question: When and how did phonetic spelling begin in Mesopotamian writing?

Next steps 8

1
49score
Details

Read the five non-name GIR3 NI entries (W 22135,0; IM 074298; MS 2427; MS 2443; MSVO 1, 217) in full context and classify each as person, office or commodity.

2
39score
Details

Collate on photographs the NI names (P006268, P005573, P006053, P006118, P006182 and the SAG/SZU NI names) and the five counted GIR3 NI entries (W 22135,0; IM 074298; MS 2427; MS 2443; MSVO 1, 217): is the sign NI, does it stand inside the name, and are the counted entries persons?

3
39score
Details

Have a specialist check on photographs that NI in P006268, P005573, P006053, P006118, P006182 and the SAG/SZU NI names is the NI sign (not a variant of a similar sign) and stands within the name, and whether the counted GIR3 NI entries at Uruk and Jemdet Nasr are persons.

4
39score
Details

Collate the NI names on photographs with a specialist.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takesAll 8 on the question

How it was found 1 run

Result. In ED IIIa, IIIb and OAkk names, NI goes with body parts at the background rate (13/14%, 18/18%, 13/14%), and -ni after body parts is barely above -ni after other signs (5.0% vs 4.3–4.7%). No ì + body-part ('oil for the feet') names or lemmas exist. In Archaic Ur names NI is already the verbal prefix i3- and final -ni.
Share of NI-containing PN types that contain a body-part sign, vs all PN types; NI rate after body-part signs vs after other signsED IIIb 0.176 vs 0.175The archaic NI–body-part pairing has no Sumerian counterpart; it counts against the possessive reading and does not support the oil reading.

Sources 2

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). Later Sumerian names do not pair -ni with body parts, and grammar is not written before Archaic Ur [Evidence EVD0DG3615CKNTR]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DG3615CKNTR
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.