Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Evidence · Proto-cuneiform: the archaic texts of Uruk

Correction: archaic names match Sumerian names no more often than shuffled names do

When the archaic name signs are reshuffled across names, keeping each sign's frequency and each name's length, the reshuffled names match attested Early Dynastic/Old Akkadian names as often as the real ones (10.9% of types vs a null median of 11.3%, p = 0.63; 12.5% of tokens vs 12.8%, p = 0.58). The session 8 excess over ordinary entries comes from which signs names use, not from particular names surviving.

Supported0

What it means

Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onProto-cuneiform records Sumerian
Counts against3 for, 6 against
Still possibleunchanged
What it implies
  1. The 'minority layer of Sumerian names' claim is withdrawn: the archaic names give no positive sign of Sumerian once the sign stock is held fixed.For the key question: What language, if any, do the proto-cuneiform texts record?
  2. Single matched names (giri3-ni, e2-zi, en-ki) are not candidate readings; a reading needs a match the shuffle null cannot produce, e.g. a rare-sign combination or an order constraint.For: Do the roughly 440 personal names in the archaic texts follow Sumerian, Semitic or some other naming pattern?

Next steps 14

1
Labels or names: element reuse against Early Dynastic
Could shiftGood odds~4 h
40score
Details

Compare how the archaic names reuse their elements (type-token curves, share of elements in two or more distinct names, compositional pairs) with Early Dynastic names at matched sample sizes; linguistic names, of any language, reuse a small vocabulary productively, while ad hoc labels should not.

2
Test the numeral-order argument on Sumerian accounts
Could shiftGood odds~6 h
34score
Details

Englund argues that putting the numeral before the noun is un-Sumerian; Dahl notes that account formats may have their own order. In Early Dynastic administrative texts written in Sumerian (Fara and later, from CDLI or Oracc), measure how often the numeral precedes the counted noun. If Sumerian accounts also put it first, the syntax argument drops out and the Sumerian answer loses one objection; if they put it after, the archaic order stays as evidence for the unknown answer.

3
Officials' names in Uruk III
Could decideFair odds~10 h
28score
Details

Identify name-like entries attached to officials and institutions in Uruk III (heads of households, seal owners, officials in the Professions-list vocabulary) and score them against the Early Dynastic benchmark. Sumerian-pattern officials with non-Sumerian dependents point to a foreign workforce; non-Sumerian officials point to non-Sumerian scribes or a labelling notation.

4
Officials' names
Could decideFair odds~10 h
28score
Details

Test name-like entries attached to officials and institutions in Uruk III, to separate the scribes' own naming culture from the listed workers'.

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takesAll 14 on the question

How it was found 1 run

Result. Real archaic names match later Sumerian names no more often than random recombinations of the same signs: 10.9% vs 11.3% of types (p = 0.63) and 12.5% vs 12.8% of tokens (p = 0.58); allowing for unwritten grammar, 13.2% vs 11.8% (p = 0.14).
Share of Uruk multi-sign name types whose sign multiset equals an ED/OAkk PN, vs names rebuilt by shuffling name signs0.109Withdraw the session 8 continuity claim: the excess over ordinary entries reflects the name sign stock, not surviving names.
Figure 1

Archaic names match later Sumerian names at the shuffle rate

Share of 311 Uruk III multi-sign name types matching an ED I–OAkk personal name; null from 1,000 shuffles of name signs

0.10.120.1495 %real namesshuffle medianmatch rate
0.10.120.1495 %real namesshuffle median
The session 8 comparison with ordinary entries (4.2%) measured the sign stock, not survival.

Sources 1

SRC

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). Correction: archaic names match Sumerian names no more often than shuffled names do [Evidence EVD0DG360TEAHCH]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DG360TEAHCH
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.