Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
Answer · Proto-cuneiform: the archaic texts of Uruk

The names favour Sumerian name elements

The archaic names use the signs of the common Sumerian name elements more often than the rest of the corpus does: a Sumerian naming tradition written with word-signs before phonetic spelling.

Still possibleAnswers 1 question0

Where it stands

Still possibleOne piece of evidence for, three against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

What it predicts

  • Names will contain the signs of Englund's Sumerian element list more often than pseudo-names drawn from the administrative baseline (above the null's 97.5th percentile).
  • The enrichment will hold in excavated archives (Jemdet Nasr, Uruk), not only in unprovenanced ones.
  • Run the same way on a tagged Early Dynastic Sumerian name list, the element share will fall in the same range as the archaic names'.

What would rule it out

  • The element share of archaic names is at or below the corpus baseline across archives.
  • A tagged Early Dynastic Sumerian name list scored by the same procedure gives an element share several times the archaic one.

Evidence 1 for · 3 against

Tested by 3 runs

RunMeasuredResultAgainstDecisionDate
Runshare of recurring multi-sign names (same sign set, two or more attestations) transliterated in more than one order{'share': 0.379, 'EN_recurring': 10, 'recurring_names': 58, 'EN_recurring_mixed': 5, 'written_in_2plus_orders': 22, 'EN_first_in_recurring_attestations': '18 of 27'}Repeated names are not written in a fixed order, and half the repeated EN names occur in both orders. The EN-first tendency is not a name template, so session 2's speculative EN-first evidence is withdrawn as support. Image collation is not needed to reach this conclusion.
Runshare of names containing at least one of Englund's elements against a length-matched null; token odds ratio with a text-cluster bootstrap{'ED_I-II': {'names': 326, 'or_95': [4.66, 7.12], 'observed': 0.402, 'odds_ratio': 5.84, 'null_median': 0.089}, 'ED_IIIa': {'names': 11799, 'or_95': [4.71, 5.01], 'observed': 0.465, 'odds_ratio': 4.86, 'null_median': 0.14}, 'ED_IIIb': {'names': 31083, 'or_95': [4.39, 4.55], 'observed': 0.528, 'odds_ratio': 4.47, 'null_median': 0.184}, 'Uruk_III_archaic': {'names': 540, 'or_95': [1.09, 1.6], 'observed': 0.124, 'odds_ratio': 1.35, 'null_median': 0.098}}Each corpus's own non-proper-noun lemmatized words (ED) or non-name administrative entries (Uruk III)The Sumerian name corpora are enriched three- to four-and-a-half-fold in every period, and the archaic names are not. This meets the kill criterion of H-NAMES-SUMERIAN: the archaic names do not have a Sumerian onomastic profile.
Runelement share by archive group against a resampling null; count of names with EN first against a within-name shuffle{'EN_first': {'p': '<0.0002', 'first': 54, 'names': 80, 'expected': 33.2, 'shuffle_95': [25, 42]}, 'PAP_first': {'first': 6, 'names': 27, 'shuffle_95': [7, 17]}, 'S_excavated': {'null_95': [0.056, 0.169], 'observed': 0.105}, 'S+EN_excavated': {'n': 124, 'null_95': [0.121, 0.25], 'observed': 0.161}, 'S_unprovenanced': {'null_95': [0.067, 0.123], 'observed': 0.13}, 'S+EN_unprovenanced': {'n': 416, 'null_95': [0.127, 0.2], 'observed': 0.296}}Resampled Uruk III administrative signs (archive split) · 5,000 within-name shuffles (position)Exploratory, decided after the main run. The EN enrichment is confined to the unprovenanced group (mostly Schøyen, 'Umma?') and absent from the excavated archives, so it counts against a general Sumerian naming signal. EN is strongly name-initial in the editors' order, which is evidence for an en-X template only if collation confirms the order.

The questions it answers

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). The names favour Sumerian name elements [Answer ANS0DFQRT0P7MAJ]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0DFQRT0P7MAJ
Private beta Downloads are for beta members

We're in a private beta while we get things right. Everything here is free to read; downloading datasets, sources and code is open to members for now.

It takes a couple of minutes. We'll reply by email.