Are the Pictish symbols a writing system?
Most likely: the symbols are emblems of rank, kin group, office or territory that do not encode wordsAhead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
Where it stands
Four answers have been proposed. The symbols are emblems of rank, kin group, office or territory that do not encode words. leads, with evidence 2 for: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible. Of the two narrower questions under it, none is answered yet.
Answers 4
History
- Thomas puts forward: the symbols are emblems of rank, kin group, office or territory that do not encode words.
- Samson puts forward: the symbols are a writing system, used mainly to record personal names.
- Fraser: the same symbols, drawn to the same conventions and mostly in pairs, recur across the whole area.Against: The symbols are decoration or religious imagery without fixed referential meaning.
- Lee et al.: the 2010 entropy test classed the symbols with writing and not with random or heraldic systems.For: The symbols are a writing system, used mainly to record personal names.
- Noble et al.: symbol stones occur at high-status sites such as Rhynie.For: The symbols are emblems of rank, kin group, office or territory that do not encode words.
- Sproat: two measures that do separate linguistic from non-linguistic corpora classify the Pictish symbols as…Against: The symbols are a writing system, used mainly to record personal names.
- Sproat: repetition-based and corrected entropy measures place the Pictish corpus with non-linguistic systems.For: The symbols are emblems of rank, kin group, office or territory that do not encode words.
- Noble et al.: the 2018 dating places the system alongside ogham and runes and its authors read it as a naming system.For: The symbols are a writing system, used mainly to record personal names.
- Asked on this site