Answer · Phaistos Disc
The Achterberg et al. Luwian reading is substantially correct.
The Achterberg et al. Luwian reading is substantially correct.
Where it stands
DisputedNone pieces of evidence for, one against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
What it predicts
- The text is grammatical Luwian and its sign comparanda are of the right date.
What would rule it out
- The comparanda are anachronistic or the grammar fails.
Evidence none for · 1 against
AGAINST
The questions it answers
AnsweredNo answer ahead
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). The Achterberg et al. Luwian reading is substantially correct. [Answer ANS0D1GGCSE3R9G]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D1GGCSE3R9G
@misc{mysteriesdept_ans0d1ggcse3r9g,
title = {The Achterberg et al. Luwian reading is substantially correct.},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Answer, catalog key ANS0D1GGCSE3R9G},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0D1GGCSE3R9G}
}