Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

How many of the 150,000 fragments can still be rejoined, and how much context does rejoining recover for rare graphs?

Asked 31 Oct 2026 by ·1 answer·0·0 following
One answer, none aheadNone is ahead yet. See what would settle it.

Where it stands

One answer has been proposed. None is ahead on the evidence yet. One is still possible.

Why it matters

About 90 percent of the 150,000 or so pieces are fragments, and a century of hand rejoining has produced several thousand joins recorded in databases such as Fudan's Zhuiyu lianzhu⁠[1]⁠[2]. Deep-learning systems since 2020 rank candidate joins with 98.39 percent top-10 accuracy on known pairs, and platform tools have found about 500 duplicate rubbings, but the number of new joins confirmed by scholars from these systems is not published⁠[3]⁠[4].

Answers 1

Evidence: 1 for
Still possible

Next steps 1

1
Watch for the results of the 2025 Anyang AI competition (due late October 2025) and record the number of algorithm-proposed joins confirmed by palaeographers.
~3 h
—not judged
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

History

  1. Chongsheng Zhang et al.: a 2020 deep-learning system ranked the correct join in its top 10 for 98.39 percent of held-out fragment pairs, and…For: Automated rejoining recovers context at scale
  2. Fang Aiqing: a 2020 deep-learning system ranked the correct join in its top 10 for 98.39 percent of held-out fragment pairs, and…For: Automated rejoining recovers context at scale
  3. Session 1: raised the question, proposed one answer and found one result bearing on its answers
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion