Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

Who wrote the treatise in PHerc. 1667?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·Part of What do the still-sealed rolls contain?·4 answers·0·0 following
Most likely: the treatise is by another Stoic of the late third or second century BC, possibly in Chrysippus's schoolAhead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.

Where it stands

Four answers have been proposed. The treatise is by another Stoic of the late third or second century BC, possibly in Chrysippus's school. leads, with evidence 1 for: partly supported by its tests. Three are still possible.

Why it matters

PHerc. 1667 is the first roll read in full, but its title is lost with the upper part of the roll, so its author must be argued from content⁠[1].

Answers 4

None of these.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: none yet
Still possible
The treatise is by Chrysippus.
Not tested enough to call either way
Evidence: 1 for, 1 against
Still possible

History

  1. Sider: the library's opened rolls include Philodemus's works that discuss and criticise other schools.For: The treatise is an Epicurean work, perhaps by Philodemus, that discusses Stoic views and names Stoics in…
  2. ScienceBlog puts forward: the treatise is by Chrysippus.
  3. Angelotti et al. puts forward: the treatise is by another Stoic of the late third or second century BC, possibly in Chrysippus's school.
  4. Angelotti et al.: the editors date the copy to the second century BC and do not name an author.Against: The treatise is by Chrysippus.
  5. Angelotti et al.: the mention of Aristocreon, Chrysippus's nephew and pupil, ties the text to his circle.For: The treatise is by Chrysippus.
  6. Angelotti et al.: lexical and conceptual features, and the Aristocreon reference, point to a Stoic context dated around the end…For: The treatise is by another Stoic of the late third or second century BC, possibly in Chrysippus's school.
  7. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion