Evidence · Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field

Isserlin's 1976 comparison found the Glozel signs matched no single ancient alphabet closely, which a direct copy from…

Isserlin's 1976 comparison found the Glozel signs matched no single ancient alphabet closely, which a direct copy from one printed table would be expected to show.

Speculative0

What it means

Key questionWhich published alphabets do the Glozel signs resemble, and could a forger of the 1920s have drawn on them?

No answer ahead yet

Openunchanged

Answer this evidence bears onA repertoire assembled from printed alphabet tables

Counts against1 for, 1 against

Still possibleunchanged

Next steps 1

Build a dated table of first appearances of each sign type from Vayson de Pradenne 1927 and Morlet's fascicles, and match it against alphabet handbooks printed before 1930.

~10 h

On: Which published alphabets do the Glozel signs resemble, and could a forger of the 1920s have drawn on them?

—not judged

Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes

Sources 1

Note sur les inscriptions de Glozel

Isserlin 1976

SRC

Cite it

Mysteries Department. (2026). Isserlin's 1976 comparison found the Glozel signs matched no single ancient alphabet closely, which a direct copy from… [Evidence EVD0DEDYXWDVCMJ]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEDYXWDVCMJ

@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0dedyxwdvcmj,
  title     = {Isserlin's 1976 comparison found the Glozel signs matched no single ancient alphabet closely, which a direct copy from…},
  author    = {{Mysteries Department}},
  year      = {2026},
  note      = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DEDYXWDVCMJ},
  url       = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEDYXWDVCMJ}
}