Evidence · Glozel: the inscribed tablets of the Fradin field
Dussaud showed that the 22 letters on the first 21 tablets match the late Phoenician of the Eshmunazar sarcophagus and…
Dussaud showed that the 22 letters on the first 21 tablets match the late Phoenician of the Eshmunazar sarcophagus and that about ten Ahiram letters are absent, while Iberian-type signs and five-point pebbles appeared after the journal Portugalia reached Morlet.
What it means
Key questionWhich published alphabets do the Glozel signs resemble, and could a forger of the 1920s have drawn on them?
No answer ahead yet
Openunchanged
Answer this evidence bears onA repertoire assembled from printed alphabet tables
Supports1 for, 1 against
Still possibleunchanged
Next steps 1
1
Build a dated table of first appearances of each sign type from Vayson de Pradenne 1927 and Morlet's fascicles, and match it against alphabet handbooks printed before 1930.
~10 h
—not judged
Ranked by how likely each is to move the key question, for the time it takes
Sources 2
Autour des inscriptions de Glozel
SRCDussaud 1927
Chronologie de Glozel
SRCPradenne 1927
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). Dussaud showed that the 22 letters on the first 21 tablets match the late Phoenician of the Eshmunazar sarcophagus and… [Evidence EVD0DEDYWWND4HE]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEDYWWND4HE
@misc{mysteriesdept_evd0dedywwnd4he,
title = {Dussaud showed that the 22 letters on the first 21 tablets match the late Phoenician of the Eshmunazar sarcophagus and…},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Evidence, catalog key EVD0DEDYWWND4HE},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/EVD0DEDYWWND4HE}
}