Answer · Earth flyby anomaly
An alternative empirical formula (Busack 2007) that predicted the Rosetta null results.
An alternative empirical formula (Busack 2007) that predicted the Rosetta null results.
Where it stands
DisputedNone pieces of evidence for, one against. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
What it predicts
- Juno 2013 about −7 mm/s.
What would rule it out
- A Juno result inconsistent with −7 mm/s.
Evidence none for · 1 against
AGAINST
The questions it answers
Open5 answers, none ahead
Cite it
Mysteries Department. (2026). An alternative empirical formula (Busack 2007) that predicted the Rosetta null results. [Answer ANS0CWYEE4M3ZDD]. https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0CWYEE4M3ZDD
@misc{mysteriesdept_ans0cwyee4m3zdd,
title = {An alternative empirical formula (Busack 2007) that predicted the Rosetta null results.},
author = {{Mysteries Department}},
year = {2026},
note = {Answer, catalog key ANS0CWYEE4M3ZDD},
url = {https://mysteriesdept.com/r/ANS0CWYEE4M3ZDD}
}