Are the fragments that surfaced on the antiquities market after 2002 genuine?
Most likely: most or all post-2002 market fragments are modern forgeries, often on ancient leatherAhead on the evidence, not yet confirmed. It needs two reviews to be accepted.
Where it stands
Three answers have been proposed. Most or all post-2002 market fragments are modern forgeries, often on ancient leather. leads, with evidence 2 for: supported by its tests. Two are still possible.
Why it matters
Unprovenanced fragments have been published and used as evidence; if they are modern, they contaminate the corpus[1].
Answers 3
History
- Davis et al. puts forward: most or all post-2002 market fragments are modern forgeries, often on ancient leather.
- Davis et al.: nine market fragments show material and palaeographic signs of modern production.For: Most or all post-2002 market fragments are modern forgeries, often on ancient leather.
- Greshko: an investigation found all 16 Museum of the Bible fragments to be forgeries.For: Most or all post-2002 market fragments are modern forgeries, often on ancient leather.
- Anava et al.: dNA analysis separated some debated fragments from the Qumran scrolls, which shows that tests can sort them.For: Some market fragments are forged but others are genuine pieces from the caves.
- Asked on this site