Mysteries Department
Sign inRequest access
0

What made the Copiale cipher solvable when similar-looking documents are not?

Asked 26 Oct 2026 by ·3 answers·0·0 following
Answered: A long text (75,000 characters), a known cipher type (homophonic substitution) and a natural language that a…Passed its tests and review.

Where it stands

Three answers have been proposed. A long text (75,000 characters), a known cipher type (homophonic substitution) and a natural language that a… leads, with evidence 2 for: supported by its tests. Two are still possible.

Why it matters

The answer sets expectations for the site's unsolved documents: which of their features match the Copiale case and which do not⁠[1].

Answers 3

None of these.
Failed a test; not refuted outright
Evidence: none yet
Disputed

History

  1. Knight et al. puts forward: a long text (75,000 characters), a known cipher type (homophonic substitution) and a natural language that a…
  2. University of Southern California: language identification by expectation-maximisation across eighty languages found German; the solution…For: A long text (75,000 characters), a known cipher type (homophonic substitution) and a natural language that a…
  3. Knight et al.: the text's length and its ordinary German prose gave the statistics enough to work on.For: A long text (75,000 characters), a known cipher type (homophonic substitution) and a natural language that a…
  4. University of Southern California: the first phrases emerged from the statistical solution before the society was identified.Against: External knowledge (the Oculists, Masonic ritual vocabulary) was what made the reading possible.
  5. Knight et al. puts forward: external knowledge (the Oculists, Masonic ritual vocabulary) was what made the reading possible.
  6. Asked on this site
Add evidence
1What it bears on2What you found3Where it comes from
Which answer?
Does it count for or against it?
In a sentence, what did you find?
What you found optional
Where it comes from optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Propose an answer
Your answer, in a sentence
What would rule it out? optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Ask a sub-question
Your question
Why it would help optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.
Add a source
The source
What it shows about this question optional
Two reviewers check it before it counts, one of whom backs a different answer. You'll hear back by email: accepted, needs changes, or a duplicate.

Discussion 0

Add to the discussion