0
Review of M. Kantiréa and D. Summa (eds), Inscriptiones Graecae XV 2.1: Inscriptiones Cypri orientalis
Beatrice Pestarino, 2021.
What it's used for here
Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2021.12.26. Notes that the Golgoi epithet Mykeroa (IG XV 2.1 no. 325) may be Eteocypriot and that the undeciphered "Golgian" language may or may not be a variant of Eteocypriot. Used for the Golgoi question.
Our copy
Research copy, for editors and curators. The work is the publisher's, so readers are sent to it. We keep this copy so the citation can be checked if the page changes or goes.
bmcr.brynmawr.edu · fetched 31 Oct 2026
Loading…
Cited by on this site 2 records
Cite it
Beatrice Pestarino (2021). Review of M. Kantiréa and D. Summa (eds), Inscriptiones Graecae XV 2.1: Inscriptiones Cypri orientalis. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.12.26/
@misc{pestarino2021review,
author = {Beatrice Pestarino},
title = {Review of M. Kantiréa and D. Summa (eds), Inscriptiones Graecae XV 2.1: Inscriptiones Cypri orientalis},
year = {2021},
url = {https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.12.26/}
}TY - GEN TI - Review of M. Kantiréa and D. Summa (eds), Inscriptiones Graecae XV 2.1: Inscriptiones Cypri orientalis AU - Beatrice Pestarino PY - 2021 UR - https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.12.26/ ER -
. “Review of M. Kantiréa and D. Summa (eds), Inscriptiones Graecae XV 2.1: Inscriptiones Cypri orientalis.” 2021.