Review of The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript by Claire Bowern and Luke Lindemann

Torsten Timm, Andreas Schinner, 2021. Cryptologia.

A critical response to Bowern and Lindemann's 2021 review of the linguistics of the Voynich Manuscript, setting out what Timm and Schinner see as serious flaws in it.

Voynich ManuscriptArticledoi: 10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875Checked against the original0

What it's used for here

The linguistic-datasets survey cites its complaint that the Wikipedia comparison samples contain markup fragments that inflate repetition counts.

Cited by on this site 2 records

2 methods surveys

Linguistics, encoding procedures

SRC

Cite it

Timm, T., & Schinner, A. (2021). Review of The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript by Claire Bowern and Luke Lindemann. Cryptologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875

@article{timm2021review,
  author = {Timm, Torsten and Schinner, Andreas},
  title = {Review of The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript by Claire Bowern and Luke Lindemann},
  journal = {Cryptologia},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Review of The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript by Claire Bowern and Luke Lindemann
AU  - Timm, Torsten
AU  - Schinner, Andreas
PY  - 2021
JO  - Cryptologia
DO  - 10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875
ER  -

Timm, Torsten and Andreas Schinner. “Review of The linguistics of the Voynich manuscript by Claire Bowern and Luke Lindemann.” Cryptologia (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2021.1911875.