0
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Sara Steegen, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman et al., 2016. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Proposes multiverse analysis: rather than reporting one analysis, run it across every reasonable combination of data-processing choices and show how much the result depends on them. The authors illustrate this with a psychology dataset on fertility and religiosity.
What it's used for here
The inquiry-framework report adopts multiverse analysis, noting that the Voynich work has a natural multiverse in its competing transliterations and processing choices.
Cited by on this site 1 record
1 methods surveys
SRCFrameworks of inquiry
Cite it
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
@article{steegen2016increasing,
author = {Steegen, Sara and Tuerlinckx, Francis and Gelman, Andrew and Vanpaemel, Wolf},
title = {Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis},
journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1177/1745691616658637},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637}
}TY - JOUR TI - Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis AU - Steegen, Sara AU - Tuerlinckx, Francis AU - Gelman, Andrew AU - Vanpaemel, Wolf PY - 2016 JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science DO - 10.1177/1745691616658637 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637 ER -
Steegen, Sara et al.. “Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637.