0
The preregistration revolution
Brian A. Nosek, Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander C. DeHaven et al., 2018. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Argues that research should separate generating hypotheses from testing them, and recommends preregistering questions and analysis plans before results are seen, with practical advice for cases that fall short of the ideal.
What it's used for here
The inquiry-framework survey takes preregistration as the rule for confirmatory runs: hypotheses, analyses and decision rules are fixed before the outcome data are seen.
Cited by on this site 1 record
1 methods surveys
SRCFrameworks of inquiry
Cite it
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
@article{nosek2018preregistration,
author = {Nosek, Brian A. and Ebersole, Charles R. and DeHaven, Alexander C. and Mellor, David T.},
title = {The preregistration revolution},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1708274114},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114}
}TY - JOUR TI - The preregistration revolution AU - Nosek, Brian A. AU - Ebersole, Charles R. AU - DeHaven, Alexander C. AU - Mellor, David T. PY - 2018 JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DO - 10.1073/pnas.1708274114 UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114 ER -
Nosek, Brian A. et al.. “The preregistration revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.