0
Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist
Ross D. King, Kenneth E. Whelan, Ffion M. Jones et al., 2004. Nature.
Describes a robot scientist that formed hypotheses about gene function in yeast, chose which experiments to run, carried them out automatically and revised its hypotheses from the results.
What it's used for here
The inquiry-framework report takes it as the model for choosing the next test by expected information gain per unit cost.
Cited by on this site 1 record
1 methods surveys
SRCFrameworks of inquiry
Cite it
King, R. D., Whelan, K. E., Jones, F. M., Reiser, P. G. K., Bryant, C. H., Muggleton, S. H., Kell, D. B., & Oliver, S. G. (2004). Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02236
@article{king2004functional,
author = {King, Ross D. and Whelan, Kenneth E. and Jones, Ffion M. and Reiser, Philip G. K. and Bryant, Christopher H. and Muggleton, Stephen H. and Kell, Douglas B. and Oliver, Stephen G.},
title = {Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist},
journal = {Nature},
year = {2004},
doi = {10.1038/nature02236},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02236}
}TY - JOUR TI - Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist AU - King, Ross D. AU - Whelan, Kenneth E. AU - Jones, Ffion M. AU - Reiser, Philip G. K. AU - Bryant, Christopher H. AU - Muggleton, Stephen H. AU - Kell, Douglas B. AU - Oliver, Stephen G. PY - 2004 JO - Nature DO - 10.1038/nature02236 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02236 ER -
King, Ross D. et al.. “Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist.” Nature (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02236.