A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks

Norman Fenton, Martin Neil, David A. Lagnado, 2013. Cognitive Science.

Sets out a general way to model legal arguments about evidence as Bayesian networks, with reusable 'idioms' for common patterns such as testimony and opportunity.

Voynich ManuscriptArticledoi: 10.1111/cogs.12004Checked against the original0

What it's used for here

The inquiry-framework survey cites it for drawing the evidence behind each theory as a chart.

Cited by on this site 1 record

1 methods surveys

Frameworks of inquiry

SRC

Cite it

Fenton, N., Neil, M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2013). A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004

@article{fenton2013general,
  author = {Fenton, Norman and Neil, Martin and Lagnado, David A.},
  title = {A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks},
  journal = {Cognitive Science},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.1111/cogs.12004},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks
AU  - Fenton, Norman
AU  - Neil, Martin
AU  - Lagnado, David A.
PY  - 2013
JO  - Cognitive Science
DO  - 10.1111/cogs.12004
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004
ER  -

Fenton, Norman et al.. “A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks.” Cognitive Science (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004.